Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Aug 1;31(15):4410-6.
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg645.

Hydropathic analysis of the free energy differences in anthracycline antibiotic binding to DNA

Affiliations

Hydropathic analysis of the free energy differences in anthracycline antibiotic binding to DNA

Derek J Cashman et al. Nucleic Acids Res. .

Abstract

Molecular models of six anthracycline antibiotics and their complexes with 32 distinct DNA octamer sequences were created and analyzed using HINT (Hydropathic INTeractions) to describe binding. The averaged binding scores were then used to calculate the free energies of binding for comparison with experimentally determined values. In parsing our results based on specific functional groups of doxorubicin, our calculations predict a free energy contribution of -3.6 +/- 1.1 kcal x mol(-1) (experimental -2.5 +/- 0.5 kcal x mol(-1)) from the groove binding daunosamine sugar. The net energetic contribution of removing the hydroxyl at position C9 is -0.7 +/- 0.7 kcal x mol(-1) (-1.1 +/- 0.5 kcal x mol(-1)). The energetic contribution of the 3' amino group in the daunosamine sugar (when replaced with a hydroxyl group) is -3.7 +/- 1.1 kcal x mol(-1) (-0.7 +/- 0.5 kcal x mol(-1)). We propose that this large discrepancy may be due to uncertainty in the exact protonation state of the amine. The energetic contribution of the hydroxyl group at C14 is +0.4 +/- 0.6 kcal x mol(-1) (-0.9 +/- 0.5 kcal x mol(-1)), largely due to unfavorable hydrophobic interactions between the hydroxyl oxygen and the methylene groups of the phosphate backbone of the DNA. Also, there appears to be considerable conformational uncertainty in this region. This computational procedure calibrates our methodology for future analyses where experimental data are unavailable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structures of the six anthracycline antibiotics used in our studies, showing the differences in functional groups that are deficient in various compounds.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Stereo diagram of a HINT interaction map for the intercalation of doxorubicin with the CAGC base pair sequence of DNA, which displays, visually, the quality and magnitude of the various binding contacts involved in the interaction. The contour surfaces are color coded by interaction type at a constant map density value of ±75. Blue surfaces represent favorable polar interactions; red surfaces represent unfavorable polar interactions; green surfaces represent favorable hydrophobic interactions; magenta surfaces represent unfavorable hydrophobic interactions. The interatomic distance between the N3′ ammonium on the doxorubicin sugar ring and the carbonyl oxygen atoms of three surrounding base pairs of DNA is also indicated.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Stereo diagram of a HINT interaction map for the intercalation of hydroxydoxorubicin with the CAGC base pair sequence of DNA, which displays, visually, the quality and magnitude of the various binding contacts involved in the interaction. The contour surfaces are color coded by interaction type at a constant map density value of ±75. Blue surfaces represent favorable polar interactions; red surfaces represent unfavorable polar interactions; green surfaces represent favorable hydrophobic interactions; magenta surfaces represent unfavorable hydrophobic interactions. The interatomic distance between the N3′ ammonium on the doxorubicin sugar ring and the carbonyl oxygen atoms of three surrounding base pairs of DNA is also indicated.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Weiss R.B. (1992) The anthracyclines: will we ever find a better doxorubicin? Semin. Oncol., 19, 670–686. - PubMed
    1. Momparler R.L., Karon,M., Siegel,S.E. and Avila,F. (1976) Effect of adriamycin on DNA, RNA and protein synthesis in cell-free systems and intact cells. Cancer Res., 36, 2891–2895. - PubMed
    1. Tewey K.M., Rowe,T.C., Yang,L., Halligan,B.D. and Lui,L.F. (1984) Adriamycin-induced DNA damage mediated by mammalian DNA topoisomerase II. Science, 226, 466–468. - PubMed
    1. Schneider E., Hsiang,Y. and Lui,L.F. (1990) DNA topoisomerases as anticancer drug targets. Adv. Pharmacol., 21, 149–183. - PubMed
    1. Sander M. and Tsieh,T.-S. (1983) Double strand DNA cleavage by type II DNA topoisomerase from Drosophila melanogaster. J. Biol. Chem., 258, 8421–8428. - PubMed

Publication types