A comparative study of imipenem versus piperacillin plus gentamicin in the initial management of febrile neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies
- PMID: 1289359
- DOI: 10.1093/jac/30.6.843
A comparative study of imipenem versus piperacillin plus gentamicin in the initial management of febrile neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies
Erratum in
- J Antimicrob Chemother 1993 Apr;31(4):621
Abstract
Three-hundred and twelve episodes of fever in 234 neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies were treated empirically with either imipenem or a combination of piperacillin and gentamicin. There were no significant differences in the percentages of patients responding to therapy at either 72 h (59% and 56% of assessable episodes in the imipenem and combination groups respectively) or at the end of treatment (55% and 53% of assessable episodes in the imipenem and combination groups respectively). Patients in the piperacillin plus gentamicin group experienced significantly more renal tubular damage whereas those who received imipenem suffered more nausea or vomiting. We conclude that imipenem monotherapy represents an acceptable alternative to piperacillin plus gentamicin as empirical therapy of the febrile neutropenic patient.
Similar articles
-
Piperacillin/tazobactam plus gentamicin as empirical therapy for febrile neutropenic patients with haematological malignancy.J Chemother. 1992 Oct;4(5):281-5. doi: 10.1080/1120009x.1992.11739178. J Chemother. 1992. PMID: 1336043 Clinical Trial.
-
Ciprofloxacin plus piperacillin compared with tobramycin plus piperacillin as empirical therapy in febrile neutropenic patients. A randomized, double-blind trial.Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jul 16;137(2):77-87. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-2-200207160-00005. Ann Intern Med. 2002. PMID: 12118962 Clinical Trial.
-
[Comparative study of piperacillin/tazobactam versus imipenem/cilastatin in febrile neutropenia (1994-1996)].Med Clin (Barc). 2001 May 5;116(16):610-1. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(01)71921-5. Med Clin (Barc). 2001. PMID: 11412645 Clinical Trial. Spanish.
-
Use of imipenem as empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2003 May;21(5):393-402. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(03)00002-5. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2003. PMID: 12727070 Review.
-
Piperacillin/tazobactam: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in moderate to severe bacterial infections.Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(11):1135-75. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119110-00006. Pharmacoeconomics. 2001. PMID: 11735679 Review.
Cited by
-
Management of febrile neutropenia in low risk cancer patients.Thorax. 2000 Aug;55 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S63-9. doi: 10.1136/thorax.55.suppl_1.s63. Thorax. 2000. PMID: 10943642 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Imipenem/cilastatin: an update of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of serious infections.Drugs. 1996 Jan;51(1):99-136. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199651010-00008. Drugs. 1996. PMID: 8741235 Review.
-
The emergence of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.Leuk Lymphoma. 2014 Dec;55(12):2858-65. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2014.896007. Epub 2014 Mar 24. Leuk Lymphoma. 2014. PMID: 24559288 Free PMC article.
-
Ciprofloxacin. An updated review of its pharmacology, therapeutic efficacy and tolerability.Drugs. 1996 Jun;51(6):1019-74. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199651060-00010. Drugs. 1996. PMID: 8736621 Review.
-
The cost-effectiveness of empirical antibiotic treatments for high-risk febrile neutropenic patients: A decision analytic model.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(20):e20022. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020022. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 32443305 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical