The Duluth clean indoor air ordinance: problems and success in fighting the tobacco industry at the local level in the 21st century
- PMID: 12893598
- PMCID: PMC1447940
- DOI: 10.2105/ajph.93.8.1214
The Duluth clean indoor air ordinance: problems and success in fighting the tobacco industry at the local level in the 21st century
Abstract
Case study methodology was used to investigate the tobacco industry's strategies to fight local tobacco control efforts in Duluth, Minn. The industry opposed the clean indoor air ordinance indirectly through allies and front groups and directly in a referendum. Health groups failed to win a strong ordinance because they framed it as a youth issue rather than a workplace issue and failed to engage the industry's economic claims. Opponents' overexploitation of weaknesses in the ordinance allowed health advocates to construct a stronger version. Health advocates should assume that the tobacco industry will oppose all local tobacco control measures indirectly, directly, or both. Clean indoor air ordinances should be framed as workplace safety issues.
Similar articles
-
Boards of Health as venues for clean indoor air policy making.Am J Public Health. 2002 Feb;92(2):257-65. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.2.257. Am J Public Health. 2002. PMID: 11818302 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Communicating with local elected officials: lessons learned from clean indoor air ordinance campaigns.Health Promot Pract. 2010 Mar;11(2):275-81. doi: 10.1177/1524839908324781. Epub 2008 Nov 14. Health Promot Pract. 2010. PMID: 19011117
-
Effects of clean indoor air laws on bar and restaurant revenue in Minnesota cities.Am J Prev Med. 2010 Dec;39(6 Suppl 1):S10-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.09.011. Am J Prev Med. 2010. PMID: 21074671
-
Lessons learned on the road to a smoke-free Italy.Ann Ig. 2011 Mar-Apr;23(2):125-36. Ann Ig. 2011. PMID: 21770229 Free PMC article.
-
Public health under attack: the American Stop Smoking Intervention Study (ASSIST) and the tobacco industry.Am J Public Health. 2004 Feb;94(2):240-50. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.2.240. Am J Public Health. 2004. PMID: 14759933 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Securing Smokefree Laws Covering Casinos and Bars in Louisiana via Messaging, Continuous Campaigning and Health Coalitions.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 25;19(7):3936. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073936. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35409615 Free PMC article.
-
Smokefree implementation in Colombia: Monitoring, outside funding, and business support.Salud Publica Mex. 2017 Mar-Apr;59(2):128-136. doi: 10.21149/7884. Salud Publica Mex. 2017. PMID: 28562713 Free PMC article.
-
A pilot qualitative study of New Zealand policymakers' knowledge of, and attitudes to, the tobacco industry.Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2007 Jul 25;4:17. doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-4-17. Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2007. PMID: 17651500 Free PMC article.
-
Strategies for knowledge exchange for action to address place-based determinants of health inequalities: an umbrella review.J Public Health (Oxf). 2023 Aug 28;45(3):e467-e477. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdac146. J Public Health (Oxf). 2023. PMID: 36451281 Free PMC article.
-
Failure of policy regarding smoke-free bars in the Netherlands.Eur J Public Health. 2013 Feb;23(1):139-45. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckr173. Epub 2011 Dec 5. Eur J Public Health. 2013. PMID: 22143826 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Samuels B, Glantz S. The politics of local tobacco control. JAMA. 1991;16:2110–2117. - PubMed
-
- Samuels B, Begay M, Hazan A, Glantz S. Philip Morris’ failed experiment in Pittsburgh. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1992;17:329–351. - PubMed
-
- Traynor M, Begay M, Glantz S. New tobacco industry strategy to prevent local tobacco control. JAMA. 1993;270:479–486. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous