Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Aug;238(2):161-7.
doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000081094.66659.c3.

Hospital volume, length of stay, and readmission rates in high-risk surgery

Affiliations

Hospital volume, length of stay, and readmission rates in high-risk surgery

Philip P Goodney et al. Ann Surg. 2003 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: Aimed at reducing surgical deaths, several recent initiatives have attempted to establish volume-based referral strategies in high-risk surgery. Although payers are leading the most visible of these efforts, it is unknown whether volume standards will also reduce resource use.

Methods: We studied postoperative length of stay and 30-day readmission rate after 14 cardiovascular and cancer procedures using the 1994-1999 national Medicare database (total n = 2.5 million). We used regression techniques to examine the relationship between length of stay, 30-day readmission, and hospital volume, adjusting for age, gender, race, comorbidity score, admission acuity, and mean social security income.

Results: Mean postoperative length of stay ranged from 3.4 days (carotid endarterectomy) to 19.6 days (esophagectomy). There was no consistent relationship between volume and mean length of stay; it significantly increased across volume strata for 7 of the 14 procedures and significantly decreased across volume strata for the other 7. Mean length of stay at very-low-volume and very-high-volume hospitals differed by more than 1 day for 6 procedures. Of these, the mean length of stay was shorter in high-volume hospitals for 3 procedures (pancreatic resection, esophagectomy, cystectomy), but longer for other procedures (aortic and mitral valve replacement, gastrectomy). The 30-day readmission rate also varied widely by procedure, ranging from 9.9% (nephrectomy) to 22.2% (mitral valve replacement). However, volume was not related to 30-day readmission rate with any procedure.

Conclusion: Although hospital volume may be an important predictor of operative mortality, it is not associated with resource use as reflected by length of stay or readmission rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
FIGURE 1. (a) Mean postoperative length of stay for 6 cardiovascular procedures, based on data from the national Medicare population (1994–1999). P < 0.05 for all differences across volume strata. (b) Mean postoperative length of stay for 8 cancer resections, based on data from the national Medicare population (1994–1999). P < 0.05 for all differences across volume strata.
None

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EVA, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States: 1994-1999. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1128–1137. - PubMed
    1. Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, et al. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 1998;280:1747–1751. - PubMed
    1. Dudley RA, Johansen KL, Brand R, et al. Selective referral to high volume hospitals: estimating the potential impact on hospital mortality. JAMA. 2000;283:1159–1166. - PubMed
    1. Halm EA, Lee C, Chassin MR. Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann Intern Med. 2002; 137(6):I52. - PubMed
    1. Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson EV, Birkmeyer CM. Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative. Surgery. 2001;130:415–422. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms