Editorial
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000081084.36358.2d.
Is it defensible to use volume standards for purchasing care?
- PMID: 12894007
- PMCID: PMC1422676
- DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000081084.36358.2d
Item in Clipboard
Editorial
Is it defensible to use volume standards for purchasing care?
Ann Surg.
2003 Aug.
No abstract available
Comment on
-
Hospital volume, length of stay, and readmission rates in high-risk surgery.Ann Surg. 2003 Aug;238(2):161-7. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000081094.66659.c3. Ann Surg. 2003. PMID: 12894006 Free PMC article.
Similar articles
-
The volume-outcome relationship: don't believe everything you see.World J Surg. 2005 Oct;29(10):1241-4. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-7993-8. World J Surg. 2005. PMID: 16136280 Review.
-
Volume as a marker of surgical quality.J Surg Oncol. 2007 Dec 1;96(7):539-40. doi: 10.1002/jso.20875. J Surg Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17657747 No abstract available.
-
Data briefing. Why length-of-stay link is so vital.Health Serv J. 2005 Feb 10;115(5942):24. Health Serv J. 2005. PMID: 15736593 No abstract available.
-
The volume-quality relationship: insufficient evidence for use as a quality indicator.Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13(5):325-6. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.5.325. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004. PMID: 15465931 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The case against volume as a measure of quality of surgical care.World J Surg. 2005 Oct;29(10):1222-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-7987-6. World J Surg. 2005. PMID: 16151664 Review.
References
-
- Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson WG. The comparative assessment and improvement of quality of surgical care in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Arch Surg. 2002;137:20–27. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
