Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Aug;238(2):275-82.
doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000081093.73347.28.

Right lobe living donor liver transplantation-addressing the middle hepatic vein controversy

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Right lobe living donor liver transplantation-addressing the middle hepatic vein controversy

Vanessa H de Villa et al. Ann Surg. 2003 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To describe our approach in the decision-making for taking the middle hepatic vein with the graft or leaving it with the remnant liver in right lobe live donor liver transplantation.

Summary background data: Right lobe living donor liver transplantation has been successfully performed. However, the extent of donor hepatectomy is still a subject of debate and the main considerations in the decision making are graft functional adequacy and donor safety.

Methods: An algorithm based on donor-recipient body weight ratio, right lobe-to-recipient standard liver volume estimate, and donor hepatic venous anatomy was used to decide the extent of donor hepatectomy. This algorithm was applied in 25 living donor liver transplant operations performed between January 1999 and January 2002. In grafts taken without the middle hepatic vein, anterior segment tributaries draining into it were not reconstructed. Outcomes between right lobe liver transplants with (Group I) and without (Group II) the middle hepatic vein were compared.

Results: Ten grafts included the middle hepatic vein and 15 did not. The mean graft to recipient standard liver volume ratio was 58% and 64% in Groups I and II, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant. Donors from both groups had comparable recovery, with 2 complications, 1 from each group, requiring a percutaneous drainage procedure. The recipient outcomes were, likewise, comparable and there was 1 case of structural outflow obstruction in Group I, which required venoangioplasty and stenting. There were 2 recipient mortalities, 1 due to a biliary complication and the other to recurrent hepatitis C. Another patient required retransplantation for secondary biliary cirrhosis. The overall actuarial graft and patient survival rates are 84% and 96%, respectively, at a median follow-up of 16 months.

Conclusion: Based on certain preoperative criteria, a right lobe graft can be taken with or without the middle hepatic vein with equally successful outcomes in both the donors and recipients. The decision, therefore, of the extent of right lobe donor hepatectomy should be tailored to the particular conditions of each case.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
FIGURE 1. Algorithm for determining the extent of donor hepatectomy in right lobe living donor liver transplantation, with or without the middle hepatic vein (MHV). DRBW, donor-recipient body weight ratio; RLRSLV, right lobe-to-recipient standard liver volume estimate; V5, draining vein of segment V; V8, draining vein of segment VIII; RHV, right hepatic vein.
None
FIGURE 2. Comparison of serial postoperative (A) aspartate aminotransferase (AST), (B) alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and (C) total bilirubin (TB) between right lobe donors who donated (Group I) and retained (Group II) the MHV.

References

    1. Kiuchi T, Kasahara M, Uryuhara K, et al. Impact of graft size mismatching on graft prognosis in liver transplantation from living donors. Transplantation. 1999;67:321–327. - PubMed
    1. Sugawara Y, Makuuchi M, Takayama T, et al. Small-for-size grafts in living related liver transplantation. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;192:510–513. - PubMed
    1. Lo CM, Fan ST, Liu CL, et al. Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using extended right lobe grafts. Ann Surg. 1997;226:261–269. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee S, Park K, Hwang S, et al. Congestion of right liver graft in living donor liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2001;71:812–814. - PubMed
    1. Inomata Y, Uemoto S, Asonuma K, et al. Right lobe graft in living donor liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2000;69:258–264. - PubMed

Publication types