Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2003 Aug;12(4):263-72.
doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.4.263.

Randomised controlled trial of a shared care programme for newly referred cancer patients: bridging the gap between general practice and hospital

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Randomised controlled trial of a shared care programme for newly referred cancer patients: bridging the gap between general practice and hospital

J D Nielsen et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effect of a shared care programme on the attitudes of newly referred cancer patients towards the healthcare system and their health related quality of life and performance status, and to assess patients' reports on contacts with their general practitioner (GP).

Setting: Department of Oncology at Aarhus University Hospital and general practices.

Design: Randomised controlled trial in which patients completed questionnaires at three time points. The shared care programme included transfer of knowledge from the oncologist to the GP, improved communication between the parties, and active patient involvement.

Participants: 248 consecutive cancer patients recently referred to the department.

Main outcome measures: Patients' attitudes towards the healthcare services, their health related quality of life, performance status, and reports on contacts with their GPs.

Results: The shared care programme had a positive effect on patient evaluation of cooperation between the primary and secondary healthcare sectors. The effect was particularly significant in men and in younger patients (18-49 years) who felt they received more care from the GP and were left less in limbo. Young patients in the intervention group rated the GP's knowledge of disease and treatment significantly higher than young patients in the control group. The number of contacts with the GP was significantly higher in the intervention group. The EORTC quality of life questionnaire and performance status showed no significant differences between the two groups.

Conclusions: An intersectoral shared care programme in which GPs and patients are actively involved has a positive influence on patients' attitudes towards the healthcare system. Young patients and men particularly benefit from the programme.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Shared care: step down or step up?
    Maher EJ, Millar D. Maher EJ, et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Aug;12(4):242. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.4.242. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003. PMID: 12897353 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Qual Health Care. 1999 Sep;8(3):154-60 - PubMed
    1. Qual Health Care. 1999 Mar;8(1):16-21 - PubMed
    1. Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(3):315-22 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988 Jan 9;296(6615):97-8 - PubMed
    1. Soc Sci Med. 1990;30(7):811-8 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms