Differences in the abilities of individual fingers during the performance of fast, repetitive tapping movements
- PMID: 12898096
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1552-z
Differences in the abilities of individual fingers during the performance of fast, repetitive tapping movements
Abstract
Using 12 healthy male subjects, the dynamic motor ability of individual fingers was investigated under four different finger tapping conditions. These were: maximum speed tapping with one finger (single-finger tapping), alternate movement of two fingers (double-finger tapping), double-finger tapping in an unsupported condition, and submaximum constant speed tapping with one finger in a passive manner. Key-contact forces for all fingers and the movement velocity of the tapping finger were monitored. With the exception of the unsupported condition, non-tapping fingers were maintained in contact with designated keys during the tapping tasks. It was found that the index finger attained the fastest cadence and greatest movement velocity, followed by the middle, little and ring fingers, respectively. Subjective assessment of rank order of "difficulty" of tapping by the subjects was highly correlated with tapping cadence. Thus dynamic motor function, as indicated by rapid, repetitive movement, differs among the individual fingers. Parallel changes were observed in the key-contact force of the neighboring non-tapping fingers during tapping. The range of the non-tapping finger forces was largest during tapping by the ring finger. A similar trend was found for passive tapping, during which the magnitude of key-contact force was less than one-third of that observed during active tapping. The lower cadence achieved by the ring finger may be attributed more to a lack of independence at the level of voluntary neuromuscular control, than to innate mechanical interaction with the other fingers. Tapping cadence of each finger was lower for the double-finger mode than for the single-finger mode. The magnitude of the observed decrease in cadence during double-finger tapping was, on the other hand, strongly dependent on finger-combination. The decrease was smallest for the index-middle finger-combination, and greatest for the ring-little finger-combination. Compatibilities with other fingers can play an essential role in the dynamic motor function of individual fingers. During the unsupported task, in which interactions were diminished by allowing all fingers to move freely, tapping cadence increased markedly. Therefore, the lower cadences observed in specific finger-combinations may be partly attributed to anatomical and neural interdigit interactions.
Similar articles
-
Temporal and force characteristics of fast double-finger, single-finger and hand tapping.Ergonomics. 2001 Dec 15;44(15):1368-83. doi: 10.1080/00140130110107452. Ergonomics. 2001. PMID: 11936828
-
Temporal and Force Characteristics of Rapid Single-Finger Tapping in Healthy Older Adults.Motor Control. 2019 Oct 1;23(4):518-534. doi: 10.1123/mc.2018-0060. Motor Control. 2019. PMID: 30971170
-
Finger tapping ability in healthy elderly and young adults.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 Mar;42(3):449-55. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181b7f3e1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010. PMID: 19952813
-
How does the brain create rhythms?Ideggyogy Sz. 2010 Jan 30;63(1-2):13-23. Ideggyogy Sz. 2010. PMID: 20420120 Review.
-
Unprompted Alteration of Freely Chosen Movement Rate During Stereotyped Rhythmic Movement: Examples and Review.Motor Control. 2021 Apr 20;25(3):385-402. doi: 10.1123/mc.2020-0049. Motor Control. 2021. PMID: 33883299 Review.
Cited by
-
Dopamine replacement modulates oscillatory coupling between premotor and motor cortical areas in Parkinson's disease.Cereb Cortex. 2014 Nov;24(11):2873-83. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht140. Epub 2013 Jun 2. Cereb Cortex. 2014. PMID: 23733911 Free PMC article.
-
The statistics of natural hand movements.Exp Brain Res. 2008 Jun;188(2):223-36. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1355-3. Epub 2008 Mar 28. Exp Brain Res. 2008. PMID: 18369608 Free PMC article.
-
A novel method for the quantification of key components of manual dexterity after stroke.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 Aug 2;12:64. doi: 10.1186/s12984-015-0054-0. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015. PMID: 26233571 Free PMC article.
-
How the hand has shaped sign languages.Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 13;12(1):11980. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15699-1. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35831441 Free PMC article.
-
Relationship between skill training and skill transfer through the example of bimanual motor learning.Eur J Neurosci. 2024 Jan;59(1):54-68. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16194. Epub 2023 Dec 11. Eur J Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 38081160 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources