Quantitative assessment of cerebral autoregulation from transcranial Doppler pulsatility: a computer simulation study
- PMID: 12900181
- DOI: 10.1016/s1350-4533(02)00251-5
Quantitative assessment of cerebral autoregulation from transcranial Doppler pulsatility: a computer simulation study
Abstract
Transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonography is largely used today to achieve non-invasive assessment of cerebral autoregulation and cerebrovascular reactivity in neurosurgical patients. Recent experimental and clinical studies suggest that not only the pattern of mean velocity, but also velocity pulse amplitude alterations during changes in cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) contain information on autoregulation status. The aim of this work is to investigate the relationship between cerebral autoregulation and TCD pulsatility by means of a comprehensive mathematical model of intracranial dynamics and cerebrovascular regulation. Simulation results, performed using different values of the most important clinical parameters of the model (autoregulation strength, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) outflow resistance and intracranial elastance coefficient) show that velocity pulse amplitude increases with a reduction in CPP in patients with intact autoregulation, whereas changes in velocity pulsatility are modest in patients with weak autoregulation. Finally, velocity pulse amplitude decreases during a CPP reduction in patients with impaired autoregulation. Moreover, the relationship between the velocity pulse amplitude changes and autoregulation strength is almost linear in a wide range of CPP values, and is scarcely affected by changes in CSF circulation and intracranial elasticity. Starting from these results, we suggest a new quantitative index to assess autoregulation strength, i.e. G(aut)% = (s-b)/a, where G(aut)% is autoregulation strength (100% means intact autoregulation, 0% means impaired autoregulation), a approximately -0.03; b approximately 1.5 and s is the slope of the relationship ' percentage changes of velocity pulse amplitude to arterial pressure pulse amplitude vs. CPP changes'.
Similar articles
-
Relationships among cerebral perfusion pressure, autoregulation, and transcranial Doppler waveform: a modeling study.J Neurosurg. 1998 Aug;89(2):255-66. doi: 10.3171/jns.1998.89.2.0255. J Neurosurg. 1998. PMID: 9688121
-
Dynamic cerebral autoregulation assessment using an ARX model: comparative study using step response and phase shift analysis.Med Eng Phys. 2003 Oct;25(8):647-53. doi: 10.1016/s1350-4533(03)00015-8. Med Eng Phys. 2003. PMID: 12900180 Clinical Trial.
-
Transcranial Doppler pulsatility index: not an accurate method to assess intracranial pressure.Neurosurgery. 2010 Jun;66(6):1050-7. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000369519.35932.F2. Neurosurgery. 2010. PMID: 20495421
-
Monitoring of cerebrovascular autoregulation: facts, myths, and missing links.Neurocrit Care. 2009;10(3):373-86. doi: 10.1007/s12028-008-9175-7. Epub 2009 Jan 6. Neurocrit Care. 2009. PMID: 19127448 Review.
-
[Use of transcranial Doppler ultrasonography for evaluation of intracranial pressure].Neurol Neurochir Pol. 1992 May-Jun;26(3):375-82. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 1992. PMID: 1454125 Review. Polish.
Cited by
-
Review of zero-D and 1-D models of blood flow in the cardiovascular system.Biomed Eng Online. 2011 Apr 26;10:33. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-10-33. Biomed Eng Online. 2011. PMID: 21521508 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography: From methodology to major clinical applications.World J Cardiol. 2016 Jul 26;8(7):383-400. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v8.i7.383. World J Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 27468332 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Meaning of Intracranial Pressure-to-Blood Pressure Fisher-Transformed Pearson Correlation-Derived Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure: Testing Empiric Utility in a Mechanistic Model.Crit Care Med. 2018 Dec;46(12):e1160-e1166. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003434. Crit Care Med. 2018. PMID: 30239383 Free PMC article.
-
Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound: Physical Principles and Principal Applications in Neurocritical Care Unit.J Cardiovasc Echogr. 2016 Apr-Jun;26(2):28-41. doi: 10.4103/2211-4122.183746. J Cardiovasc Echogr. 2016. PMID: 28465958 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources