Cancer follow-up care. Patients' perspectives
- PMID: 12901486
- PMCID: PMC2214255
Cancer follow-up care. Patients' perspectives
Abstract
Objective: To assess family physicians' and specialists' involvement in cancer follow-up care and how this involvement is perceived by cancer patients.
Design: Self-administered survey.
Setting: A health region in New Brunswick.
Participants: A nonprobability cluster sample of 183 participants.
Main outcome measures: Patients' perceptions of cancer follow-up care.
Results: More than a third of participants (36%) were not sure which physician was in charge of their cancer follow-up care. As part of follow-up care, 80% of participants wanted counseling from their family physicians, but only 20% received it. About a third of participants (32%) were not satisfied with the follow-up care provided by their family physicians. In contrast, only 18% of participants were dissatisfied with the follow-up care provided by specialists. Older participants were more satisfied with cancer follow-up care than younger participants.
Conclusion: Cancer follow-up care is increasingly becoming part of family physicians' practices. Family physicians need to develop an approach that addresses patients' needs, particularly in the area of emotional support.
Similar articles
-
Family physicians' roles in cancer care. Survey of patients on a provincial cancer registry.Can Fam Physician. 2004 Jun;50:889-96. Can Fam Physician. 2004. PMID: 15233372 Free PMC article.
-
Supportive care provided by physicians and nurses to women with breast cancer. Results from a population-based survey.Support Care Cancer. 2002 Nov;10(8):647-52. doi: 10.1007/s00520-002-0370-3. Epub 2002 Jul 20. Support Care Cancer. 2002. PMID: 12436224
-
Health care system reform. Ontario family physicians' reactions.Can Fam Physician. 2001 Sep;47:1777-84. Can Fam Physician. 2001. PMID: 11570303 Free PMC article.
-
GP versus hospital follow up for cancer patients. Is the choice based on evidence?Aust Fam Physician. 1999 Apr;28(4):356-9. Aust Fam Physician. 1999. PMID: 10330761 Review. No abstract available.
-
Juvenile cancer: improving care for adolescents and young adults within the frame of medical oncology.Ann Oncol. 2005 Feb;16(2):181-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdi036. Ann Oncol. 2005. PMID: 15668268 Review.
Cited by
-
A randomised controlled trial to improve the role of the general practitioner in cancer rehabilitation: effect on patients' satisfaction with their general practitioners.BMJ Open. 2013 Jul 3;3(7):e002726. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002726. Print 2013. BMJ Open. 2013. PMID: 23824312 Free PMC article.
-
The interface between primary and oncology specialty care: treatment through survivorship.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(40):25-30. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq002. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010. PMID: 20386051 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cancer rehabilitation: psychosocial rehabilitation needs after discharge from hospital?Scand J Prim Health Care. 2008;26(4):216-21. doi: 10.1080/02813430802295610. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2008. PMID: 18792854 Free PMC article.
-
Use of physician services during the survivorship phase: a multi-province study of women diagnosed with breast cancer.Curr Oncol. 2017 Apr;24(2):81-89. doi: 10.3747/co.24.3454. Epub 2017 Apr 27. Curr Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28490921 Free PMC article.
-
Challenges in Cancer Control Services Provided by Family Physicians in Primary Care: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study From Karabuk Province in Turkey.J Cancer Prev. 2018 Dec;23(4):176-182. doi: 10.15430/JCP.2018.23.4.176. Epub 2018 Dec 30. J Cancer Prev. 2018. PMID: 30671400 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials