Randomized phase III trial of paclitaxel, etoposide, and carboplatin versus carboplatin, etoposide, and vincristine in patients with small-cell lung cancer
- PMID: 12902441
- DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djg017
Randomized phase III trial of paclitaxel, etoposide, and carboplatin versus carboplatin, etoposide, and vincristine in patients with small-cell lung cancer
Abstract
Background: Paclitaxel administered in combination with a topoisomerase-II inhibitor (such as etoposide) and carboplatin is an effective and safe first-line treatment for patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). We conducted a randomized phase III multicenter trial to determine whether paclitaxel plus etoposide plus carboplatin improves the outcome of patients with primary SCLC relative to standard chemotherapy (carboplatin, etoposide, and vincristine).
Methods: Between January 1998 and December 1999, 614 patients with SCLC stages I-IV were randomly assigned to the standard arm (309 patients) or the experimental arm (305 patients). Treatment courses were repeated every 21 days for a maximum of six courses. All patients were evaluated for response rate, survival, and toxicities every two courses. The primary endpoint was survival. Survival curves were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. All statistical tests were two-sided.
Results: A total of 608 patients were evaluable for all endpoints (standard arm 307 patients, experimental arm 301 patients). The hazard ratio [HR] of death for patients receiving the standard treatment was statistically significantly higher than that for patients receiving the experimental treatment (HR = 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03 to 1.45; P =.024). Progression-free survival was also statistically significantly shorter for patients in the standard arm relative to that of patients in the experimental arm (HR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.42). There were no differences in the response rates (complete and partial combined) to the treatments (standard arm: 69.4%, 95% CI = 63.9% to 74.5%; experimental arm: 72.1%, 95% CI = 66.7% to 77.1%; difference = 2.7%, 95% CI = 4.5% to 9.9%). Rates of severe grade of anemia, leukocytopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were lower in the experimental arm than in the standard arm.
Conclusion: Patients with previously untreated SCLC who received paclitaxel, etoposide, and carboplatin showed improved overall and progression-free survival and less frequent hematologic toxicities than those who received the standard therapy.
Comment in
-
An advance in small-cell lung cancer treatment--more or less.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Aug 6;95(15):1099-101. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djg013. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003. PMID: 12902431 Review. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Efficient palliation in patients with small-cell lung cancer by a combination of paclitaxel, etoposide and carboplatin: quality of life and 6-years'-follow-up results from a randomised phase III trial.Lung Cancer. 2006 Jul;53(1):67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.04.001. Epub 2006 May 19. Lung Cancer. 2006. PMID: 16713013 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized phase III trial of dose-dense chemotherapy supported by whole-blood hematopoietic progenitors in better-prognosis small-cell lung cancer.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 May 4;97(9):666-74. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji114. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005. PMID: 15870437 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized phase III trial of topotecan following carboplatin and paclitaxel in first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a gynecologic cancer intergroup trial of the AGO-OVAR and GINECO.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Aug 2;98(15):1036-45. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj296. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006. PMID: 16882940 Clinical Trial.
-
Paclitaxel added to the cisplatin/etoposide regimen in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer -- the use of complete response rate as the primary endpoint in phase II trials.Lung Cancer. 2001 May;32(2):155-62. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5002(00)00220-8. Lung Cancer. 2001. PMID: 11325486 Review.
-
Carboplatin-etoposide combination in small cell lung cancer patients older than 70 years: a phase II trial.Lung Cancer. 2002 Jan;35(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5002(01)00288-4. Lung Cancer. 2002. PMID: 11750705 Review.
Cited by
-
[Updated strategies in Small Cell Lung Cancer post ASCO 2007].Wien Med Wochenschr. 2007;157(21-22):562-8. doi: 10.1007/s10354-007-0484-9. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2007. PMID: 18157594 Review. German.
-
Chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer: a comprehensive review.Oncol Rev. 2012 Apr 2;6(1):e4. doi: 10.4081/oncol.2012.e4. eCollection 2012 Mar 5. Oncol Rev. 2012. PMID: 25992206 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A phase II study of paclitaxel + etoposide + cisplatin + concurrent radiation therapy for previously untreated limited stage small cell lung cancer (E2596): a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.J Thorac Oncol. 2009 Apr;4(4):527-33. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31819c7daf. J Thorac Oncol. 2009. PMID: 19240650 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical Benefits of new Systemic Therapy for Small-Cell Lung Cancer Over Two Decades: A Cross-Sectional Study.Clin Respir J. 2024 Nov;18(11):e70032. doi: 10.1111/crj.70032. Clin Respir J. 2024. PMID: 39476816 Free PMC article.
-
Paclitaxel as third-line chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer failing both etoposide- and camptothecin-based chemotherapy.Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Oct;96(42):e8176. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008176. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017. PMID: 29049199 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical