Cervical arthroplasty in the management of spondylotic myelopathy
- PMID: 12902945
- DOI: 10.1097/00024720-200308000-00001
Cervical arthroplasty in the management of spondylotic myelopathy
Abstract
Cervical spinal cord compression managed via an anterior approach with an arthrodesis is associated with a decreased range of motion and accelerated adjacent segment degeneration. Artificial cervical disc replacement may address these problems. A series of seven cases (three women, two men; age 31-55 years) of anterior cervical decompression and placement of an artificial disc prosthesis is presented. A total of nine Bryan cervical disc prostheses (Spinal Dynamics Corp., Mercer Island, WA) were placed. Clinical and radiologic follow-up was performed at 24 hours, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and then yearly (mean follow-up period 6.29 months, range 1-17 months). There were no complications. There was an improvement in Nurick grade by 0.72 grade (P < 0.05) and Oswestry Neck Disability Index score by 51.4 points (P < 0.0001). Motion was preserved. Improvement in lordosis occurred in 29% of cases. The spinal cord was decompressed on postoperative imaging. Cervical arthroplasty after anterior cervical decompression at one or more levels represents an exciting tool in the management of spinal cord compression secondary to spondylotic disease or acute disc prolapse. This is the first study that looks specifically at cervical arthroplasty for cervical myelopathy. Longer follow-up will reveal any delayed problems with artificial disc implantation, but in the short term, this technique offers an excellent outcome.
Similar articles
-
Cervical arthroplasty in the management of spondylotic myelopathy: 18-month results.Neurosurg Focus. 2004 Sep 15;17(3):E8. doi: 10.3171/foc.2004.17.3.8. Neurosurg Focus. 2004. PMID: 15636564
-
Two-level artificial disc placement for spondylotic cervical myelopathy.J Clin Neurosci. 2004 May;11(4):412-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2003.10.001. J Clin Neurosci. 2004. PMID: 15080959
-
Is cervical disc arthroplasty good for congenital cervical stenosis?J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 May;26(5):577-585. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.SPINE16317. Epub 2017 Mar 10. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017. PMID: 28291414
-
Early clinical and biomechanical results following cervical arthroplasty.Neurosurg Focus. 2004 Sep 15;17(3):E9. doi: 10.3171/foc.2004.17.3.9. Neurosurg Focus. 2004. PMID: 15636565 Review.
-
High prevalence of heterotopic ossification after cervical disc arthroplasty: outcome and intraoperative findings following explantation of 22 cervical disc prostheses.J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Aug;17(2):141-6. doi: 10.3171/2012.4.SPINE12223. Epub 2012 Jun 1. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012. PMID: 22657947 Review.
Cited by
-
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with titanium cages for simple or multilevel herniated discs and spur of the cervical spine: Report of 2 cases and experience in Bali.Asian J Neurosurg. 2016 Oct-Dec;11(4):453. doi: 10.4103/1793-5482.145122. Asian J Neurosurg. 2016. PMID: 27695567 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Review on Neurological Outcomes for Cervical Degenerative Myelopathy After Anterior Decompression Surgery: Motion Preservation vs Fusion.Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Dec;16(6):969-976. doi: 10.14444/8320. Epub 2022 Jul 13. Int J Spine Surg. 2022. PMID: 35831065 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial discs for lumbar and cervical degenerative disc disease -update: an evidence-based analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(10):1-98. Epub 2006 Apr 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006. PMID: 23074480 Free PMC article.
-
How old is your cervical spine? Cervical spine biological age: a new evaluation scale.Eur Spine J. 2015 Dec;24(12):2763-70. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3673-4. Epub 2014 Nov 23. Eur Spine J. 2015. PMID: 25417070
-
Activ C cervical disc replacement for myelopathy.J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2011 Jul;2(2):82-5. doi: 10.4103/0974-8237.100062. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2011. PMID: 23125494 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical