Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Apr 14;1(1):3.
doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-1-3.

Monitoring and evaluation of human resources for health: an international perspective

Affiliations

Monitoring and evaluation of human resources for health: an international perspective

Khassoum Diallo et al. Hum Resour Health. .

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the undoubted importance of human resources to the functions of health systems, there is little consistency between countries in how human resource strategies are monitored and evaluated. This paper presents an integrated approach for developing an evidence base on human resources for health (HRH) to support decision-making, drawing on a framework for health systems performance assessment. METHODS: Conceptual and methodological issues for selecting indicators for HRH monitoring and evaluation are discussed, and a range of primary and secondary data sources that might be used to generate indicators are reviewed. Descriptive analyses are conducted drawing primarily on one type of source, namely routinely reported data on the numbers of health personnel and medical schools as covered by national reporting systems and compiled by the World Health Organization. Regression techniques are used to triangulate a given HRH indicator calculated from different data sources across multiple countries. RESULTS: Major variations in the supply of health personnel and training opportunities are found to occur by region. However, certain discrepancies are also observed in measuring the same indicator from different sources, possibly related to the occupational classification or to the sources' representation. CONCLUSION: Evidence-based information is needed to better understand trends in HRH. Although a range of sources exist that can potentially be used for HRH assessment, the information that can be derived from many of these individual sources precludes refined analysis. A variety of data sources and analytical approaches, each with its own strengths and limitations, is required to reflect the complexity of HRH issues. In order to enhance cross-national comparability, data collection efforts should be processed through the use of internationally standardized classifications (in particular, for occupation, industry and education) at the greatest level of detail possible.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Framework for the assessment of health systems performance
Figure 2
Figure 2
Selected indicators for HRH assessment
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of countries by stock of HRH, according to region, late 1990s
Figure 4
Figure 4
Distribution of countries by density of medical schools, according to region
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparison of the ratio of physicians to nursing and midwifery personnel, according to source of data, 12 countries with developed market and transitional economies

References

    1. Dussault G. Analysis of human resources situation in health: why and how? Paper prepared for Intercountry consulting on human resource development in the health field, Cairo. 15–18 February 1999.
    1. Anell A, Willis M. International comparison of health care systems using resource profiles. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2000;78:770–778. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Feachem R. Health systems: more evidence, more debate. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2000;78:715. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization World health report 2000: health systems – improving performance. Geneva. 2000. http://www.who.int/whr2001/2001/archives/2000/en/index.htm
    1. Almeida C, Braveman P, Gold MR, Szwarcwald CL, Ribeiro JM, Miglionico A, Millar JS, Porto S, do Rosario Costa N, Ortun Rubio V, Segall M, Starfield B, Travassos C, Uga A, Valente J, Viacava F. Methodological concerns and recommendations on policy consequences of the World Health Report 2000. Lancet. 2001;357:1692–1697. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04825-X. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources