Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Jul;51(7):550-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00106-002-0751-4. Epub 2003 Apr 9.

[Auditory brainstem responses evoked by direct mechanical stimulation of the ossicular chain. Objective preoperative testing of candidates for implantable hearing aids]

[Article in German]
Affiliations

[Auditory brainstem responses evoked by direct mechanical stimulation of the ossicular chain. Objective preoperative testing of candidates for implantable hearing aids]

[Article in German]
S Hoth et al. HNO. 2003 Jul.

Abstract

Background and objective: The function of several implantable hearing systems is based on the vibratory excitation of the ossicular chain. For preoperative testing, malleus vibration audiometry has been described [7]. In special cases, it could be desirable to perform objective testing before implantation. We therefore studied the auditory brainstem responses (ABR) evoked by vibratory stimulation of the ear drum.

Method: The ABR evoked by vibratory and acoustical click stimulation were recorded in 20 subjects with normal hearing at four different stimulus intensities. For the vibratory stimulation (v-ABR), the transducer rod was brought into mechanical contact with the eardrum under microscopic control. This setup was further used for the determination of the individual subjective threshold. The v-ABR were compared to conventional ABR recordings.

Results: In all subjects, the v-ABR could clearly be identified. At high stimulus levels, the complete wave pattern was observed in 15 of 20 cases. There is no essential difference between v-ABR and conventional ABR with respect to the incidence and parameters of the potentials. At high stimulus levels, a pronounced stimulus artefact impedes the identification of wave I in some cases. Moreover, the quality of v-ABR is limited by the uncomfortable situation and incomplete relaxation of the subject.

Conclusions: The measurement of vibratory evoked ABR is practicable without hazards for the patient and it yields reliable results. The hearing threshold for click stimuli can be determined from the incidence and amplitude of the responses. The loudness associated with the click stimuli can be estimated from the response latency. Therefore, the investigation of v-ABR not only gives evidence of the individual suitability for implantable hearing aids but its outcome may also be useful as an orientation for the postoperative fitting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg). 1987 Dec;66(12):655-60 - PubMed
    1. HNO. 1997 Oct;45(10):801-15 - PubMed
    1. J Acoust Soc Am. 1978 Apr;63(4):1084-92 - PubMed
    1. Laryngorhinootologie. 2001 Jul;80(7):370-80 - PubMed
    1. HNO. 1998 Oct;46(10):853-63 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources