Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Aug 9;327(7410):323.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7410.323.

Acute low back pain: systematic review of its prognosis

Affiliations

Acute low back pain: systematic review of its prognosis

Liset H M Pengel et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the course of acute low back pain and sciatica and to identify clinically important prognostic factors for these conditions.

Design: Systematic review.

Data sources: Searches of Medline, Embase, Cinahl, and Science Citation Index and iterative searches of bibliographies.

Main outcome measures: Pain, disability, and return to work.

Results: 15 studies of variable methodological quality were included. Rapid improvements in pain (mean reduction 58% of initial scores), disability (58%), and return to work (82% of those initially off work) occurred in one month. Further improvement was apparent until about three months. Thereafter levels for pain, disability, and return to work remained almost constant. 73% of patients had at least one recurrence within 12 months.

Conclusions: People with acute low back pain and associated disability usually improve rapidly within weeks. None the less, pain and disability are typically ongoing, and recurrences are common.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Means (95% confidence intervals) for pain (top) and disability (bottom) during 12 months after onset of acute low back pain
Fig 2
Fig 2
Means (95% confidence intervals) for return to work during 12 months after onset of acute low back pain of those initially off work. Reid et al report proportion returned to work, including those who returned to work and subsequently left work

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Koes BW, Van Tulder MW, Ostelo R, Burton KA, Waddell G. Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care: an international comparison. Spine 2001;26: 2504-13. - PubMed
    1. Waddell G, Burton AK. Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain at work—evidence review. London: Faculty of Occupational Medicine, 2000. - PubMed
    1. Gatchel RJ, Gardea MA. Psychosocial issues: their importance in predicting disability, response to treatment, and search for compensation. Neurol Clin 1999;17: 149-66. - PubMed
    1. Linton SJ. Occupational psychological factors increase the risk of back pain: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil 2001;11: 53-66. - PubMed
    1. Pincus T, Burton AK, Vogel S, Field AP. A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain. Spine 2002;27: E109-20. - PubMed

Publication types