An economic evaluation of sequential i.v./po moxifloxacin therapy compared to i.v./po co-amoxiclav with or without clarithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia
- PMID: 12907538
- DOI: 10.1378/chest.124.2.526
An economic evaluation of sequential i.v./po moxifloxacin therapy compared to i.v./po co-amoxiclav with or without clarithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia
Abstract
Study objective: To evaluate costs, clinical consequences, and cost-effectiveness from a German and French health-care system perspective of sequential i.v./po moxifloxacin monotherapy compared to co-amoxiclav with or without clarithromycin (AMC +/- CLA) in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) who required parenteral treatment.
Methods: Costs and consequences over 21 days were evaluated based on clinical cure rates 5 to 7 days after treatment and health resource use reported for the TARGET multinational, prospective, randomized, open-label trial. This trial compared sequential i.v./po monotherapy with moxifloxacin (400 mg qd) to i.v./po co-amoxiclav (1.2 g i.v./625 mg po tid) with or without clarithromycin (500 mg bid) for 7 to 14 days in hospitalized patients with CAP. Since no country-by-treatment interaction was found in spite of some country differences for length of hospital stays, resource data (antimicrobial treatment, hospitalization, and out-of-hospital care) from all centers were pooled and valued using German and French unit prices to estimate CAP-related cost to the German Sickness Funds and French public health-care sector, respectively.
Results: Compared to AMC +/- CLA, treatment with moxifloxacin resulted in 5.3% more patients achieving clinical cure 5 to 7 days after therapy (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 11.8%), increased speed of response (1 day sooner for median time to first return to apyrexia, p = 0.008), and a reduction in hospital stay by 0.81 days (95% CI, - 0.01 to 1.63) within the 21-day time frame. Treatment with moxifloxacin resulted in savings of 266 euro and 381 euro for Germany and France respectively, primarily due to the shorter length of hospital stay. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves show moxifloxacin has a > or = 95% chance of being cost saving from French and German health-care perspectives, and higher probability of being cost-effective at acceptability thresholds up to 2,000 euro per additional patient cured.
Conclusion: i.v./po monotherapy with moxifloxacin shows clinical benefits including increased speed of response and is cost-effective compared to i.v./po AMC +/- CLA in the treatment of CAP.
Similar articles
-
Randomized controlled trial of sequential intravenous (i.v.) and oral moxifloxacin compared with sequential i.v. and oral co-amoxiclav with or without clarithromycin in patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring initial parenteral treatment.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002 Jun;46(6):1746-54. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.6.1746-1754.2002. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002. PMID: 12019085 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A cost-minimisation analysis comparing moxifloxacin with levofloxacin plus ceftriaxone for the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia in Germany: results from the MOTIV trial.Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 May;24(5):1279-84. doi: 10.1185/030079908x280400. Epub 2008 Mar 20. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008. PMID: 18358083 Clinical Trial.
-
Sequential IV/PO moxifloxacin treatment of patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia.Respir Med. 2003 Oct;97(10):1134-42. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(03)00166-5. Respir Med. 2003. PMID: 14561021 Clinical Trial.
-
A brief review of moxifloxacin in the treatment of elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).Clin Interv Aging. 2007;2(2):179-87. Clin Interv Aging. 2007. PMID: 18044134 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A pharmacoeconomic review of the management of respiratory tract infections with moxifloxacin.Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2008 Jul;9(10):1735-44. doi: 10.1517/14656566.9.10.1735. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2008. PMID: 18570606 Review.
Cited by
-
Moxifloxacin: a review of its use in the management of bacterial infections.Drugs. 2004;64(20):2347-77. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200464200-00006. Drugs. 2004. PMID: 15456331 Review.
-
Economic evaluation of community acquired pneumonia management strategies: A systematic review of literature.PLoS One. 2019 Oct 24;14(10):e0224170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224170. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31648271 Free PMC article.
-
Economic aspects of pneumococcal pneumonia: a review of the literature.Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(11):719-40. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422110-00003. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004. PMID: 15250750 Review.
-
Escitalopram and duloxetine in major depressive disorder: a pharmacoeconomic comparison using UK cost data.Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(11):969-81. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826110-00008. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008. PMID: 18850765 Clinical Trial.
-
Position paper: recommended design features of future clinical trials of antibacterial agents for community-acquired pneumonia.Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Dec 1;47 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S249-65. Clin Infect Dis. 2008. PMID: 19018610 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous