Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003;42(11):931-40.
doi: 10.2165/00003088-200342110-00001.

Drug delivery systems for treatment of systemic hypertension

Affiliations

Drug delivery systems for treatment of systemic hypertension

L Michael Prisant et al. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003.

Abstract

Novel drug delivery systems are available in many areas of medicine. Their application in the treatment of hypertension continues to widen. Oral drug delivery systems permit antihypertensive agents that were previously administered two to four times daily to be administered once daily. Biotechnical use of chemical-dispensing systems has been applied to propranolol (polymer coated beads), clonidine (transdermal therapeutic system), nifedipine (osmotic pump and coat-core), isradipine (osmotic pump), verapamil (sodium alginate and spheroidal oral delivery absorption system), felodipine (coat-core), nisoldipine (coat-core) and diltiazem (polymer coated beads and Geomatrix. The initial goal was to lower blood pressure by a uniform amount throughout the entire day. Now, new drug delivery systems are being developed to target blood pressure in the early morning hours when most cardiovascular events occur. Two chronotherapeutic drug delivery systems are now available for verapamil (chronotherapeutic oral delivery absorption system and delayed coat osmotic pump). Disadvantages of sustained-release products include delayed achievement of pharmacodynamic effect, unpredictable bioavailability, enhanced first-pass hepatic metabolism, dose dumping, sustained toxicity, dosage inflexibility and increased cost. Potential advantages include reduced administration frequency, enhanced adherence and convenience, reduced toxicity, stable drug concentrations, uniform drug effect, decreased cost (occasionally) and decreased daily dosage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am J Cardiol. 1992 Oct 15;70(11):1072-6 - PubMed
    1. Am J Hypertens. 2001 Sep;14(9 Pt 2):277S-279S - PubMed
    1. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1999 May;33(5):791-7 - PubMed
    1. Blood Press. 1999;8(3):184-91 - PubMed
    1. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1990 Dec;48(6):676-85 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources