Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Aug 19;100(17):9663-7.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1531507100. Epub 2003 Aug 8.

Optimal design of a bistable switch

Affiliations

Optimal design of a bistable switch

Michael P Brenner et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Determining optimally designed structures is important for diverse fields of science and engineering. Here we describe a procedure for calculating the optimal design of a switch and apply the method to a bistable microelectromechanical system relay switch. The approach focuses on characterizing the unstable transition state connecting the two stable equilibria to control the force displacements. Small modifications in component shape lead to a substantial improvement in device operation. Fabrication of the optimized devices confirms the predictions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Schematic for the operation of the relay switch. Cantilevered starting zippers (Top) initiate the zipping by closing the gap and then allowing the beam to zip closed when the middle electrode is charged (Middle), causing the switch to close. Turning on the top electrode (Bottom) causes the top starting zippers to engage, and the switch opens.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
(A) Force displacement characteristics for the switch, assuming the force is applied in the center of the switch. The ratio of the maximum force to the minimum force is ≈2. (B) Tension τ2/(2π)2 in the beam as a function of the displacement in the center. Through the middle part of the cycle the tension is constant with τ 2 = 16π 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
(Upper) Evolution of the moment of inertia of the beam during the optimization. The initial ψ(x) is uniform; with increasing τ20 the beam becomes modulated. Note that the beam thickness is exaggerated relative to its length by ≈103. (Lower) Evolution of the R = (τ20)2/((τ20)2 – 2) as a function of ψmin the minimum moment of inertia of the beam.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Optimized thickness profile of the beam for ψmin = 0.5, 0.25, and 0.15, with R of 1.5, 1.29, and 1.02, respectively. Note that the beam thickness is exaggerated relative to its length by ≈103.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
(Top) Force displacement characteristics for the structure with ψmin = 0.5. R ≈ 1.43. (Middle) Force displacement characteristics for the structure with ψmin = 0.25. R ≈ 1.18. (Bottom) Force displacement characteristics for the structure with ψmin = 0.125. R ≈ 1.05.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Experiments for the optimized beam with ψmin = 0.5, 0.25, and 0.125, respectively. The fabricated beam has length 15 mm, minimum thickness 20μm, and d = 250 μm. The optimization analysis designed these structures to have R ≈ 1.43, 1.18, and 1.05, respectively, compared with the measured values R = 1.64, 1.37, and 1.28.

References

    1. Banichuk, N. V. (1983) Problems and Methods of Optimal Structural Design (Plenum, New York).
    1. Bendsoe, M. P. (1988) Comp. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 71, 197–224.
    1. Keller, J. B. (1960) Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 5, 275–285.
    1. Cox, S. J. (1992) Math. Intell. 14, 16–24.
    1. Keller, J. B. & Niordson, F. I. (1966) J. Math. Mech. 16, 433–446.

LinkOut - more resources