Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Jun;20(3 Pt 1):335-40.

[Tolerance of fiberoptic bronchoscopy by self-administered questionnaire: in the words of the patients]

[Article in French]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 12910107

[Tolerance of fiberoptic bronchoscopy by self-administered questionnaire: in the words of the patients]

[Article in French]
F Barlési et al. Rev Mal Respir. 2003 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: Fibreoptic bronchoscopy is currently undertaken by the majority of respiratory physicians, but under varying conditions. Though complications are rare the tolerance of this examination is sometimes poor, particularly when it is performed under local anaesthesia. The undesirable effects may reduce the value of the examination as well as causing discomfort for the patient.

Methods: A prospective study of the tolerance of the endoscopic examination was made on 100 consecutive patients by self-administered questionnaire.

Results: There were no major and 7 minor complications (7%). 45% of the patients were anxious but the experience of the operator tended to reassure them (p=0.07). 30% of the patients reported some pain, which tended to be exacerbated by anxiety (44% vs 18%, p=0.008) and the supine position (57% vs 43%, p=0.047). 37% of patients reported nausea, and 50% dyspnoea, without any significant predictive factor. 79% would agree to a repeat examination under the same conditions and 92% said that they had received information appropriate to the examination undergone.

Conclusion: The tolerance of fibreoptic bronchoscopy under local anaesthesia is poor and perhaps overestimated by respiratory physicians. Patient information is essential. A national enquiry could lead to the standardisation of techniques.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types