Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2003 Jul;33(4):677-93.
doi: 10.1016/s0195-5616(03)00023-8.

Update on molecular techniques for diagnostic testing of infectious disease

Affiliations
Review

Update on molecular techniques for diagnostic testing of infectious disease

Rance K Sellon. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2003 Jul.

Abstract

The era of diagnostic molecular biology has arrived for small animal clinicians, and it is a near certainty that assays such as the PCR and RT-PCR will become more widely available for a wider array of infectious agents. Already there is an extensive list of infectious diseases of dogs and cats that have been investigated with molecular tools. A partial list is included in box 1. An understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of the molecular techniques and some of the questions these techniques can answer for clinicians can serve practitioners well in their approach to the diagnosis of infectious diseases in dogs and cats. It is likely that additional applications of these tools to small animal medicine will become apparent as investigators use and refine them for their research purposes, or as new uses emerge from human medical applications. Clinicians also are likely to reap the benefits of this knowledge. Because samples often are acquired easily from clinical patients in most practice settings, access to these tools puts all clinicians in the group of discoverers of new, or variations of, infectious diseases and their clinical manifestations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic representation of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). DNA (a) in the test sample is heated to separate the two strands (b). The reaction is cooled to allow primer (short bold lines) annealing to the target DNA (c), then heated again to allow addition of nucleotides to extend the nascent DNA molecule (d). At the end of the cycle, the target DNA has been duplicated (e). Each new DNA can then itself be a targeted molecule for the next cycle of amplification. The process is repeated for 25–40 cycles, and then products are visualized following gel electrophoresis (f). The left hand lane represents DNA markers of a known size against which the size of the amplicons is measured.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schematic representation of restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), or DNA fingerprinting, analysis. DNA (A) is cut with a restriction enzyme to produce a number of DNA fragments of varying lengths (B). The DNA fragments are separated by gel electrophoresis to produce a pattern unique to the organism and the enzyme used to cut the DNA. In this representation, six different samples were analyzed, with one of the six (in the 4th lane) clearly exhibiting a pattern different from the other five.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Messick J.B, Berent L.M, Cooper S.K. Development and evaluation of a PCR-based assay for detection of Haemobartonella felis in cats and differentiation of H. felis from related bacteria by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:462–466. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Versalovic J, Lupski J.R. Molecular detection and genotyping of pathogens: more accurate and rapid answers. Trends Microbiol. 2002;10(10S):S15–S21. - PubMed
    1. Kabeya H, Maruyama S, Irei M, Takahashi R, Yamashita M, Mikami T. Genomic variations among Bartonella henselae isolates derived from naturally infected cats. Vet Microbiol. 2002;89:211–221. - PubMed
    1. Johnson C.M, Papadi G.P, Tompkins W.A, Sellon R.K, Orandle M.S, Bellah J.R. Biphasic thymus response by kittens inoculated with feline immunodeficiency virus during fetal development. Vet Pathol. 1998;35(3):191–201. - PubMed
    1. Suchy S, Bauder B, Gelbmann W, Lohr C.V, Teifke J.P, Weissenbock H. Diagnosis of feline herpesvirus infection by immunohistochemistry, polymerase chain reaction, and in situ hybridization. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2000;12(2):186–191. - PubMed

MeSH terms