Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Sep;58(9):939-44.
doi: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2003.00050.x.

Pet-keeping in early childhood and airway, nose and skin symptoms later in life

Affiliations

Pet-keeping in early childhood and airway, nose and skin symptoms later in life

C G Bornehag et al. Allergy. 2003 Sep.

Abstract

Background: It is discussed whether exposure to pets during childhood is a risk or a protective factor for sensitization and allergic symptoms. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between pet-keeping at time of birth and allergic symptoms in airways, nose and skin among young children in Sweden.

Method: A questionnaire was sent to the parents of 14 077 children (1-6 years), the focus being on allergic symptoms, home environment and other background factors including pet-keeping and avoidance behaviour. The response rate was 79%.

Results: Almost one-tenth of the population had got rid of pets because of allergy in the family, and 27.3% reported "avoidance" behaviour towards pets. In a cross-sectional analysis current pet-keeping was "protective", but this may be due to the fact that people avoid exposing their child to something that they believe is a risk factor for allergies. Pet-keeping at the time of birth was associated with "wheezing", "asthma" and "rhinitis on pet-exposure" later in life for children from families with an "avoidance" behaviour, and was not "protective" for other children. There was also an indication of a dose-response relationship between the number of types of furred pets at time of birth and later symptoms in analyses adjusted for avoidance behaviour or current pet-keeping.

Conclusion: The distribution of pet-keeping in the population is largely explained by avoidance behaviour, meaning that those who have pets mainly are those who can stand them, indicating a "healthy pet-keeping effect".

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources