Morbidity and mortality conference: a survey of academic internal medicine departments
- PMID: 12911649
- PMCID: PMC1494908
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20824.x
Morbidity and mortality conference: a survey of academic internal medicine departments
Abstract
This study sought to determine the prevalence and characteristics of morbidity and mortality conferences (M&MCs) in U.S. internal medicine training programs. Two hundred ninety-five of 416 (71%) surveys were returned. Ninety percent of programs have an M&MC. Most meet monthly, have a designated leader, and entail case discussions of 3 or fewer patients. Cases are selected on the basis of unexpected bad outcomes, teaching value, and to a lesser extent, suspected medical error. Two thirds of the sites use M&MCs to meet administrative requirements for quality assurance. M&MC, while prevalent in internal medicine training programs, has a heterogeneity of focus. Hence, the goals and role of the conference, as judged by this survey, do not appear to be well defined and may warrant further clarification.
Comment in
-
Seeing error through new lenses.J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Aug;18(8):675-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.30614.x. J Gen Intern Med. 2003. PMID: 12911652 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Biddle C, Oaster TR. Investigating the nature of the morbidity and mortality conference. Acad Med. 1990;65:420. - PubMed
-
- Bosk CL. Forgive and Remember: Managing Medical Failure. Chicago, Ill: Chicago University Press; 1979. p. 220.
-
- Harbison SP, Regehr G. Faculty and resident opinions regarding the role of morbidity and mortality conference. Am J Surg. 1999;177:136–9. - PubMed
-
- Thompson JS, Prior MA. Quality assurance and morbidity and mortality conference. J Surg Res. 1992;52:97–100. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials