Patient perspectives of medical confidentiality: a review of the literature
- PMID: 12911650
- PMCID: PMC1494903
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20823.x
Patient perspectives of medical confidentiality: a review of the literature
Abstract
Objective: To lay the groundwork for a better understanding of patient views on medical confidentiality.
Design: Studies were found by searching medline, bioethicsline, and selected bibliographies. Articles concerning physician perspectives or implications of legal and administrative regulations were excluded. Only peer-reviewed journal articles reporting original research on patients' confidentiality views and conduct were included.
Main results: Many patients are unaware of or misunderstand their legal or ethical right to medical confidentiality protections, which leads them to both over- and underestimate confidentiality protections. The possibility that medical information might be revealed, intentionally or not, to acquaintances in a clinic or other social community troubles patients as much as information release to insurers or employers. A significant minority of patients distrust confidentiality protections, leading some to report that they delay or forgo medical care. If doubtful that confidentiality will be upheld, patients will act independently to protect information.
Conclusions: Our review found a wider variety of understandings and beliefs about medical confidentiality among patients than are often indicated in the writings of practitioners or legal experts. As medical confidentiality regulations evolve, these differences need to be recognized and accounted for in interactions between practitioners and patients.
Comment in
-
Research on patient-clinician relationships: celebrating success and identifying the next scope of work.J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Aug;18(8):677-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.30615.x. J Gen Intern Med. 2003. PMID: 12911653 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Confidentiality of health information postmortem.Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2001 Sep;125(9):1189-92. doi: 10.5858/2001-125-1189-COHIP. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2001. PMID: 11520269
-
The utilitarian argument for medical confidentiality: a pilot study of patients' views.J Med Ethics. 2003 Dec;29(6):348-52. doi: 10.1136/jme.29.6.348. J Med Ethics. 2003. PMID: 14662814 Free PMC article.
-
A qualitative study of women's views on medical confidentiality.J Med Ethics. 2005 Sep;31(9):499-504. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.010280. J Med Ethics. 2005. PMID: 16131550 Free PMC article.
-
Privacy in psychiatric treatment: threats and responses.Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Nov;159(11):1809-18. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.11.1809. Am J Psychiatry. 2002. PMID: 12411211 Review.
-
Confidentiality of genetic information in the workplace.Am J Law Med. 1991;17(1-2):75-108. Am J Law Med. 1991. PMID: 1877611 Review.
Cited by
-
Biomedical data privacy: problems, perspectives, and recent advances.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jan 1;20(1):2-6. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001509. Epub 2012 Dec 6. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013. PMID: 23221359 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
In Defence of informed consent for health record research - why arguments from 'easy rescue', 'no harm' and 'consent bias' fail.BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Aug 20;21(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00519-w. BMC Med Ethics. 2020. PMID: 32819343 Free PMC article.
-
Patient and public views about the security and privacy of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) in the UK: results from a mixed methods study.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Oct 14;15:86. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0202-2. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015. PMID: 26466787 Free PMC article.
-
Women living with infertility in Iran: A qualitative content analysis of perception of dignity.Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17455057241260027. doi: 10.1177/17455057241260027. Womens Health (Lond). 2024. PMID: 38836384 Free PMC article.
-
Doctors - paradoxes and possibilities.Australas Med J. 2012;5(5):284-9. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2012.1225. Epub 2012 May 31. Australas Med J. 2012. PMID: 22848325 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Siegler M. Confidentiality in medicine—a decrepit concept. N Engl J Med. 1982;307:1518–21. - PubMed
-
- Standards for privacy of individually identifiable health information. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, DHHS. Final rule. Fed Regist. 2000;65:82462–829. (See particularly sections IIID) - PubMed
-
- Ford CA, Millstein SG. Delivery of confidentiality assurances to adolescents by primary care physicians. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151:505–9. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials