Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2003 Oct;17(10):1521-4.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8853-3. Epub 2003 Aug 15.

A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures

M A Talamini et al. Surg Endosc. 2003 Oct.

Abstract

Background: The Academic Robotics Group prospectively studied 211 robotically assisted operations to assess the safety and utility of robotically assisted surgery.

Methods: All operations took place at one of four member institutions between June 2000 and June 2001 using the recently FDA-approved daVinci robotic system. A variety of procedures were undertaken, including antireflux surgery (69), cholecystectomy (36), Heller myotomy (26), bowel resection (17), donor nephrectomy (15), left internal mammery artery mobilization (14), gastric bypass (seven), splenectomy (seven), adrenalectomy (six), exploratory laparoscopy (three), pyloroplasty (four), gastrojejunostomy (two), distal pancreatectomy (one), duodenal polypectomy (one), esophagectomy (one), gastric mass resection (one), and lysis of adhesions (one).

Results: Average operating room time was 188 min (range 45 to 387, SD = 83), surgical time 143 min (range 35 to 462, SD = 63), and robot time 90 min (range 12 to 235, SD = 47). Median length of stay was 1 day (range 0 to 37). There were 8 (4%) technical complications during procedures, five minor (four hook cautery dislodgement, one slipped robotic trocar) and three major (system malfunctions, two of which required conversion to standard laparoscopy). In all cases, technical problems caused only delay, without apparent altered outcome. There were medical/surgical complications in nine patients (4%). Six (3%) were considered major, including one death unrelated to the robotic procedure.

Conclusions: The results of robotic-assisted surgery compare favorably with those of conventional laparoscopy with respect to mortality, complications, and length of stay. Robotic-assisted surgery is safe and effective and is a new reality for American surgery. The role of these devices in surgery will expand as the technology evolves.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ann Surg. 2001 Jul;234(1):1-7 - PubMed
    1. Med Image Anal. 1999 Sep;3(3):301-19 - PubMed
    1. Surg Clin North Am. 1999 Dec;79(6):1241-8 - PubMed
    1. World J Surg. 2001 Nov;25(11):1467-77 - PubMed
    1. J Gastrointest Surg. 2002 Jan-Feb;6(1):11-5; discussion 15-6 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources