Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003;2003(3):CD001458.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001458.

Antiplatelet therapy for preventing stroke and other vascular events after carotid endarterectomy

Antiplatelet therapy for preventing stroke and other vascular events after carotid endarterectomy

S Engelter et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003.

Abstract

Background: Antiplatelet drugs are effective and safe in a wide variety of patients at high risk of vascular ischaemic events. Among patients undergoing vascular surgical procedures, these agents significantly reduce the risk of graft or native vessel occlusion. In this context we wished to examine their effects in patients after carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

Objectives: The objective of this review was to evaluate whether antiplatelet agents are safe and beneficial after endarterectomy of the internal carotid artery.

Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched: 1 October 2002). In addition we performed comprehensive searches of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2002), MEDLINE (January 1966 to September 2002) and EMBASE (January 1980 to September 2002), and checked all relevant papers for additional eligible studies.

Selection criteria: We selected randomised, controlled, unconfounded trials comparing antiplatelet agents with control after carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis of different degrees. Treatment duration had to be at least 30 days after CEA. Follow-up should be at least three months.

Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers selected trials for inclusion, assessed trial quality, and extracted data independently from each other. From each trial we extracted, first the number of patients originally allocated to each treatment group, and, second the number of patients who met the criteria for each outcome (intention-to-treat analysis). We calculated a weighted estimate of the odds for each outcome event across studies using the Peto odds ratio method.

Main results: Six trials involving 907 patients were identified. For 'death (all causes)' the Peto odds ratio of 0.77 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.48-1.24 did not show a statistically significant difference between both treatment groups. For 'stroke (any)' the Peto odds ratio of 0.58 (95%CI: 0.34-0.98) indicated a statistically significant benefit in favour of antiplatelet drugs (p=0.04). Concerning the secondary outcome events 'vascular death', 'stroke or vascular death', 'serious vascular events', 'death or dependency', 'myocardial infarction', 'major extracranial haemorrhage', 'local haemorrhage requiring surgery', 'restenosis', 'TIA or amaurosis fugax', neither any benefit nor any hazard of antiplatelet drugs could be shown. For the outcome events 'intracranial haemorrhage', 'ischaemic stroke' and 'occurrence or progression of contralateral stenosis', data were either too sparse for meaningful analyses, or not available at all.

Reviewer's conclusions: Our results may indicate that antiplatelet drugs did not significantly change the odds of 'death' but reduce the outcome 'stroke of any cause' in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. However, it can not be excluded that the beneficial effect in reducing stroke is due to chance. There is a suggestion that antiplatelets may increase the odds of haemorrhage, but there are currently too few data to quantify this effect.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None known.

Figures

1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antiplatelets versus control, Outcome 1 Death (all causes).
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antiplatelets versus control, Outcome 2 Stroke (any stroke during the follow‐up period).
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antiplatelets versus control, Outcome 3 Vascular death.
1.4
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antiplatelets versus control, Outcome 4 Stroke or vascular death.
1.5
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antiplatelets versus control, Outcome 5 Serious vascular events during follow‐up period.
1.6
1.6. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antiplatelets versus control, Outcome 6 Death or dependency at the end of follow up.
1.7
1.7. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antiplatelets versus control, Outcome 7 Myocardial infarction (all).
1.8
1.8. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antiplatelets versus control, Outcome 8 Non‐fatal myocardial infarction.
1.9
1.9. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antiplatelets versus control, Outcome 9 Ischaemic stroke during follow‐up period.
1.10
1.10. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antiplatelets versus control, Outcome 10 Intracranial haemorrhage.
1.11
1.11. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antiplatelets versus control, Outcome 11 Major extracranial haemorrhage.
1.12
1.12. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antiplatelets versus control, Outcome 12 Local haemorrhage requiring surgery.
1.13
1.13. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antiplatelets versus control, Outcome 13 Recurrent stenosis.
1.15
1.15. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antiplatelets versus control, Outcome 15 TIA or amaurosis fugax.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

References to studies included in this review

AITIA‐S 1978 {published data only}
    1. Fields WS, Lemak NA. Controlled trial of Aspirin in cerebral ischemia; study design, surveillance, and results. In: Breddin K, Dorndorf W, Loew D, Marx R editor(s). Acetylsalicylic acid in cerebral ischemia and coronary heart disease. First Edition. Stuttgartt, New York: Schattauer, 1978:85‐91.
    1. Fields WS, Lemak NA, Frankowski RF, Hardy RJ. Controlled trial of aspirin in cerebral ischemia. Part II: surgical group. Stroke 1978;9(4):309‐319. - PubMed
    1. Lemak NA, Fields WS, Gary HE Jr. Controlled trial of aspirin in cerebral ischemia: an addendum. Neurology 1986;36:705‐710. - PubMed
Boysen 1988 {published data only}
    1. Boysen G. Danish very‐low dose aspirin after carotid endarterectomy trial. Personal communication August 2001. - PubMed
    1. Boysen G, Sorensen PS, Juhler M, Andersen AR, Boas J, Olsen JS, Joensen P. Danish very‐low dose aspirin after carotid endarterectomy trial. Stroke 1988;19(10):1211‐1215. - PubMed
    1. Boysen G, Sorensen PS, Juhler M, Andersen AR, Boas J, Olsen JS, Joensen P. Low‐dose aspirin after carotid surgery. Stroke. 1988; Vol. 19:148. - PubMed
Harker 1992 {published data only}
    1. Antithrombotic Trialists' Collaboration. Collaborative meta‐analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ 2002;324:71‐86. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harker LA, Bernstein EF, Dilley RB, Scala TE, Sise MJ, Hye RJ, et al. Failure of aspirin plus dipyridamole to prevent restenosis after carotid endarterectomy. Annals of Internal Medicine 1992;116(9):731‐736. - PubMed
Kretschmer 1990 {published data only}
    1. Antithrombotic Trialists' Collaboration. Collaborative meta‐analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ 2002;324:71‐86. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bischoff G, Pratschner T, Kail M, et al. Anticoagulants, antiaggregants or nothing following carotid endarterectomy?. European Journal of Vascular Surgery 1993;7:364‐369. - PubMed
    1. Kretschmer G, Pratschner T, Prager M, et al. Antiplatelet treatment prolongs survival after carotid endarterectomy. Analysis of the clinical series followed by a controlled trial. Annals of Surgery 1990;211:317‐322. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pratschner T, Kretschmer P, Prager M, et al. Antiplatelet therapy following carotid bifurcation endarterectomy. Evaluation of a controlled clinical trial. Prognostic significance of histologic plaque examination on behalf of survival. European Journal of Vascular Surgery 1990;4:285‐289. - PubMed
Lindblad 1993 {published data only}
    1. Hansen F, Lindblad B, Persson NH, Bergquist D. Can recurrent stenosis after carotid endarterectomy be prevented by low‐dose acetylsalicylic acid? A double‐blind, randomised and placebo‐controlled study. European Journal of Vascular Surgery 1993;7(4):380‐385. - PubMed
    1. Lindblad B, Persson NH, Takolander R, Bergquist D. Does low‐dose acetylsalicylic acid prevent stroke after carotid surgery? A double‐blind, placebo‐controlled randomized trial. Stroke 1993;24(8):1125‐1128. - PubMed
Pratesi 1991 {published data only}
    1. Pratesi C, Pulli R, Milanesi G, Lavezzari M, Pamparana F, Bertini D. Indobufen versus placebo in the prevention of restenosis after carotid endarterectomy: a double‐blind pilot study. Journal of International Medical Research 1991;19(3):202‐209. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Findlay 1985 {published data only}
    1. Findlay JM, Lougheed WM, Gentili F, Walker PM, Glynn MF, Houle S. Effect of perioperative platelet inhibition on postcarotid endarterectomy mural thrombus formation. Results of a prospective randomized controlled trial using aspirin and dipyridamole in humans. Journal of Neurosurgery 1985;63(5):693‐698. - PubMed
McCollum 1993 {published and unpublished data}
    1. McCollum C. A double blind placebo controlled study to assess the effect of platelet inhibition on thrombus formation and restenosis following carotid endarterectomy. National Research Register 1993:Publication ID: C0300282.
Pedrini 1988 {published data only}
    1. Catani L, Vitacchiano G, Scatigna M, Monetti N, Pedrini L, Gugliotta L. Ticlopidine and prevention of platelet accumulation in carotid endarterectomy. Evaluation with Indium‐111 labeled platelets. Thrombosis and Haemostasis 1987;58:169.
    1. Pedrini L, Gugliotta L, Monetti N, Vitacchiano G, Catani L, Guidalotti RL, Scatigna M. Platelet adhesion in carotid endarterectomy. CV World report 1988;1:93‐96.

Additional references

ACE 1999
    1. Taylor DW, Barnett HJ, Haynes RB, Ferguson GG, Sackett DL, Thorpe KE, Simard D, Silver FL, Hachinski V, Clagett GP, Barnes R, Spence JD. Low‐dose and high‐dose acetylsalicylic acid for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: a randomised controlled trial. ASA and Carotid Endarterectomy (ACE) Trial Collaborators. Lancet 1999;353(9171):2179‐84. - PubMed
Albers 2000
    1. Albers GW. Choice of endpoints in antiplatelet trials. Which outcome is relevant for stroke patients?. Neurology 2000;54:1022‐1028. - PubMed
ATT 1994a
    1. Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration. Collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy ‐ I: Prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke by prolonged antiplatelet therapy in various categories of patients. BMJ 1994;308:81‐108. - PMC - PubMed
ATT 1994b
    1. Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration. Collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy ‐ II: Maintenance of vascular graft or arterial patency by antiplatelet therapy. BMJ 1994;308:159‐168. - PMC - PubMed
ATT 1994c
    1. Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration. Collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy ‐ III: Reduction in venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism by antiplatelet prophylaxis among surgical and medical patients. BMJ 1994;308:235‐246. - PMC - PubMed
ATT 2002
    1. Antithrombotic Trialists' Collaboration. Collaborative meta‐analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ 2002;324:71‐86. - PMC - PubMed
Chambers 2002
    1. Chambers BR, You RX, Donnan GA. Carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002, Issue 3. [Art. No.: CD001923. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001923.pub2] - PMC - PubMed
Cina 2002
    1. Cina CS, Clase CM, Haynes RB. Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002, Issue 3. [Art. No.: CD001081. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001081] - PubMed
de Bray 1995
    1. Bray JM, Glatt B. Quantification of Atheromatous Stenosis in the Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery. Cerebrovascular Diseases 1995;5:414‐426.
ECST 1998
    1. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet 1998;351:1379‐1387. - PubMed
IST 1997
    1. International Stroke Trial Group. The International Stroke Trial (IST): a randomised trial of aspirin, subcutaneous heparin, both, or neither among 19435 patients with acute ischemic stroke. Lancet 1997;349:1569‐1581. - PubMed
Jadad 1996
    1. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carrol D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJM, Gravaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Controlled Clinical Trials 1996;17:1‐12. - PubMed
Mayo Trial 1992
    1. Mayo Asymptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Study Group. Results of a randomized controlled trial of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 1992;67:513‐518. - PubMed
NASCET 1991
    1. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high‐grade carotid stenosis. New England Journal of Medicine 1991;325:445‐453. - PubMed
NASCET 1998
    1. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. New England Journal of Medicine 1998;339(20):1415‐1425. - PubMed
Rosenberg 1999
    1. Rosenberg RD. Vascular beds‐specific hemostasis and hypercoagulable states. New England Journal of Medicine 1999;340(20):1555‐1564. - PubMed
Timsit 1992
    1. Timsit SG, Sacco RL, Mohr JP, et al. Early clinical differentiation of cerebral infarction from severe atherosclerotic stenosis and cardioembolism. Stroke 1992;23:486‐491. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances