Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2003 Oct;18(10):981-5.
doi: 10.1007/s00467-003-1271-5. Epub 2003 Aug 13.

Should the Schwartz formula for estimation of GFR be replaced by cystatin C formula?

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Should the Schwartz formula for estimation of GFR be replaced by cystatin C formula?

Guido Filler et al. Pediatr Nephrol. 2003 Oct.

Abstract

It is common practice to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from the Schwartz formula (a height creatinine/ratio), although it has its limitations. Cystatin C was found to be a superior marker of GFR. No formula has been validated to estimate GFR from cystatin C in children. Children (aged 1.0-18 years, n=536) with various renal pathologies undergoing nuclear medicine GFR clearance studies ((99m)Tc-DTPA single-injection technique) were tested. Cystatin C was measured with a nephelometric assay. The Schwartz GFR was calculated using enzymatically determined serum creatinine in micromoles per liter using the constant 48 for adolescent males and 38 otherwise. Using multiple stepwise regression analysis on log/log-transformed data, we derived the following relationship between the cystatin C concentration and GFR:. Using the Bland and Altman analysis to test agreement between the Schwartz formula and gold standard GFR showed considerable bias, with a mean difference of +10.8% and a trend towards overestimation of the GFR by the Schwartz formula with lower GFRs. In contrast, the Bland and Altman analysis applied on the GFR estimate derived from cystatin C showed the mean difference to be negligible at +0.3% and no trend towards overestimation of the GFR with lower GFRs. In the regression analysis of the estimate and the GFR, the Schwartz estimate showed significant deviation from linearity, whereas the cystatin C estimate did not. In conclusion, the data suggest that this novel cystatin C-based GFR estimate shows significantly less bias and serves as a better estimate for GFR in children.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Clin Chem. 2002 May;48(5):729-36 - PubMed
    1. J Nucl Med. 1993 Oct;34(10):1761-5 - PubMed
    1. Pediatrics. 1998 May;101(5):875-81 - PubMed
    1. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1999 Feb;59(1):1-8 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources