[Effect of different methods for postoperative pain management on catecholamine response to abdominal surgery]
- PMID: 12920841
[Effect of different methods for postoperative pain management on catecholamine response to abdominal surgery]
Abstract
Objective: To observe the effect of different analgesic methods and the influence of catecholamine response to elective abdominal surgery.
Methods: 42 ASA I-II patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery were randomly divided into five groups. After receiving combined general and epidural anesthesia, postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia was provided in group RF, BF, BM with 1.2 g.L-1 ropivacaine + 2 mg.L-1 fentanyl, 1.2 g.L-1 bupivacaine + 2 mg.L-1 fentanyl, 1.2 g.L-1 bupivacaine + 80 mg.L-1 morphine respectively. Group EM received general-epidural anesthesia and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with 0.5 g.L-1 morphine. Levels of analgesics (VAS, VRS), plasma concentrations of adrenaline and noradenaline were measured.
Results: Effective analgesia could be achieved in all groups. VAS in groups BM and M was significantly less than that in groups RF, and VRS in groups BM was higher than that in groups RF, EM and M. There were more side effects in groups BM, M and EM, and the incidence of nausea was highest in group M(5 cases). The adrenaline concentrations in group BM one hour postoperation was lower than that in group BF, and noradrenaline in group EM was lower than that in group RF. The 24-hour postoperative values of the adrenaline and noradrenaline in group M were higher than their preoperative values.
Conclusions: Postoperative patient-controlled epidural or intravenous analgesia could provide effective analgesia. Epidural anesthesia during operation or epidural analgesia postoperation could depress stress responses, thus it is a more effective analgesic method.
Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness of thoracic patient-controlled epidural analgesia using bupivacaine with fentanyl vs bupivacaine with morphine after thoracotomy and upper abdominal surgery.J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Jul;88(7):921-7. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005. PMID: 16241020 Clinical Trial.
-
[Comparison of bupivacaine-fentanyl versus bupivacaine-morphine for patient controlled epidural analgesia].Agri. 2005 Apr;17(2):40-3. Agri. 2005. PMID: 15977094 Clinical Trial. Turkish.
-
Comparison of intravenous morphine, epidural morphine with/ without bupivacaine or ropivacaine in post-thoracotomy pain management with patient controlled analgesia technique.Braz J Anesthesiol. 2013 Mar-Apr;63(2):213-9. doi: 10.1016/S0034-7094(13)70218-6. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2013. PMID: 23601264 Clinical Trial.
-
Use of Epidural Analgesia as an Adjunct in Elective Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Review of 4983 Cases.Perm J. 2017;21:16-115. doi: 10.7812/TPP/16-115. Perm J. 2017. PMID: 29035177 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Epidural and Spinal Anesthesia.Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2019 Nov;49(6):1095-1108. doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Sep 4. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2019. PMID: 31492542 Review.
Cited by
-
Epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for pain following intra-abdominal surgery in adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 30;8(8):CD010434. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010434.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30161292 Free PMC article.
-
Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens for postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, vomiting and pain after abdominal surgery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 16;7(7):CD001893. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001893.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27419911 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous