Continued improvement of clinical outcome and cost effectiveness following intravascular ultrasound guided PCI: insights from a prospective, randomised study
- PMID: 12923023
- PMCID: PMC1767812
- DOI: 10.1136/heart.89.9.1043
Continued improvement of clinical outcome and cost effectiveness following intravascular ultrasound guided PCI: insights from a prospective, randomised study
Abstract
Objective: To investigate in a prospective randomised study both long term clinical effects and cost effectiveness of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with or without intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance.
Methods: 108 male patients with stable angina referred for PCI of a significant coronary lesion were randomly assigned to IVUS guided PCI or conventional PCI. Individual accumulated costs of the entire follow up period were calculated and compared in the randomisation groups. Effectiveness of treatment was measured by freedom from major adverse cardiac events.
Results: Cost effectiveness of IVUS guided PCI that was noted at six months was maintained and even accentuated at long term follow up (median 2.5 years). The cumulated cost level was found to be lower for the IVUS guided group, with a cumulated cost of &163 672 in the IVUS guided group versus &313 706 in the coronary angiography group (p = 0.01). Throughout the study, mean cost per day was lower in the IVUS guided PCI group (&2.7 v & 5.2; p = 0.01). In the IVUS group, 78% were free from major adverse cardiac events versus 59% in the coronary angiography group (p = 0.04) with an odds ratio of 2.5 in favour of IVUS guidance.
Conclusion: IVUS guidance results in continued improvement of long term clinical outcome and cost effectiveness. The results of this study suggest that IVUS guidance may be used more liberally in PCI.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of intravascular ultrasound guided percutaneous coronary intervention versus conventional percutaneous coronary intervention.Scand Cardiovasc J. 2001 Mar;35(2):80-5. doi: 10.1080/140174301750164673. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2001. PMID: 11405501 Clinical Trial.
-
Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial.Lancet. 2016 Nov 26;388(10060):2618-2628. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31922-5. Epub 2016 Oct 30. Lancet. 2016. PMID: 27806900 Clinical Trial.
-
Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in intermediate coronary artery disease: fractional flow reserve-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Aug;3(8):812-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.04.016. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010. PMID: 20723852
-
The Role of Vascular Imaging in Guiding Routine Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Bare Metal Stent and Drug-Eluting Stent Trials.Cardiovasc Ther. 2015 Dec;33(6):360-6. doi: 10.1111/1755-5922.12160. Cardiovasc Ther. 2015. PMID: 26363283 Review.
-
Effects of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: Meta-Analysis With Individual Patient-Level Data From 2,345 Randomized Patients.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov 14;9(21):2232-2239. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.021. Epub 2016 Oct 12. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016. PMID: 27744039 Review.
Cited by
-
Understanding the economic impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Mar;17(2):185-93. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0670-4. Epub 2015 Feb 11. Eur J Health Econ. 2016. PMID: 25669755
-
Comparison of intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, and conventional angiography-guided percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review, network meta-analysis, and meta-regression.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Sep;102(3):440-450. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30784. Epub 2023 Jul 22. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023. PMID: 37483068 Free PMC article.
-
Calibration-free coronary artery measurements for interventional device sizing using inverse geometry x-ray fluoroscopy: in vivo validation.J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2014 Oct;1(3):033504. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.1.3.033504. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2014. PMID: 25544948 Free PMC article.
-
Real-world use of intravascular ultrasound in Japan: a report from contemporary multicenter PCI registry.Heart Vessels. 2019 Nov;34(11):1728-1739. doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01427-9. Epub 2019 May 25. Heart Vessels. 2019. PMID: 31129872
-
Does intravascular ultrasound provide clinical benefits for percutaneous coronary intervention with bare-metal stent implantation? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 21;1:42. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-42. Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 22999055 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Baptista J, di Mario C, Escaned J, et al. Intracoronary two-dimensional ultrasound imaging in the assessment of plaque morphologic features and the planning of coronary interventions. Am Heart J 1995;129:177–87. - PubMed
-
- Gussenhoven EJ, Essed CE, Lancee CT, et al. Arterial wall characteristics determined by intravascular ultrasound imaging: an in vitro study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989;14:947–52. - PubMed
-
- Hausmann D, Johnson JA, Sudhir K, et al. Angiographically silent atherosclerosis detected by intravascular ultrasound in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and familial combined hyperlipidemia: correlation with high density lipoproteins. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:1562–70. - PubMed
-
- Nakamura S, Mahon DJ, Maheswaran B, et al. An explanation for discrepancy between angiographic and intravascular ultrasound measurements after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:633–9. - PubMed
-
- Vlodaver Z, Frech R, Van Tassel RA, et al. Correlation of the antemortem coronary arteriogram and the postmortem specimen. Circulation 1973;47:162–9. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous