Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2003 Nov-Dec;10(6):573-9.
doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1365. Epub 2003 Aug 4.

Effects of a computerized system to support shared decision making in symptom management of cancer patients: preliminary results

Cornelia M Ruland  1 , Thomas White, Marguerite Stevens, Gilbert Fanciullo, Samir M Khilani
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Effects of a computerized system to support shared decision making in symptom management of cancer patients: preliminary results

Cornelia M Ruland et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Objective: (1) To evaluate preliminary effects of a computerized support system on congruence between patients' reported symptoms and preferences and those addressed in the patient consultation and (2) to investigate the system's ease of use, time requirements, and patient satisfaction.

Design: Fifty-two patients were randomly assigned to intervention or control conditions.

Measurements: Cancer patients scheduled for an outpatient visit used the system on a tablet computer to report their symptoms and preferences prior to their consultation. This information was processed, printed, and provided to the patient and clinician in the subsequent consultation in the experimental group but not in the control group.

Results: While patients in both groups were equivalent at baseline in symptom characteristics, there was significantly greater congruence between patients' reported symptoms and those addressed by their clinicians in the experimental group. The system scored high on ease of use. There were no significant group differences in patient satisfaction.

Conclusion: This study provided beginning evidence that eliciting patients' symptoms and preferences and providing clinicians with this information prior to consultation can be an effective and feasible strategy to improve patient-centered care.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hope T. Evidence-based Patient Choice. London: Kings Fund Publishing, 2000.
    1. Holmes-Rovner M, Valade D, Orlowski C, Draus C, Nabozny-Valerio B, Keiser S. Implementing shared decision-making in routine practice: barriers and opportunities. Health Expect. 2000; 3:182–91. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lenert LA, Soetikno RM. Automated computer interviews to elicit utilities: potential applications in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997; 4:49–56. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barry MJ, Fowler FJ, JrMulley AG, JrHenderson JV, JrWennberg JE. Patient reactions to a program designed to facilitate patient participation in treatment decisions for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Med Care. 1995; 33:771–82. - PubMed
    1. O'Connor AM, Drake ER, Fiset V, Graham ID, Laupacis A, Tugwell P. The Ottawa patient decision aids. Effective Clin Pract. 1999; 2:163–70. - PubMed

Publication types