Comparison of the protective efficacy of neurotrophins and antioxidants for vibration-induced trauma
- PMID: 12925816
- DOI: 10.1159/000072253
Comparison of the protective efficacy of neurotrophins and antioxidants for vibration-induced trauma
Abstract
Background: Patients undergoing temporal bone surgery or subjects working with vibrating tools may develop vibration-induced hearing loss (VHL). The aim of this study was to characterize the effects of pretreatment with N-acetylcysteine (NAC) or the neurotrophic factors, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), on VHL in an animal model.
Methods: Trauma to the cochlea was created with a vibrating probe placed on the bone of the external ear canal. BDNF and CNTF(Ax1) were delivered into the cochlea with mini-osmotic pumps. NAC was delivered into the cochlea by round window membrane (RWM) injection, by RWM permeation, or by oral administration. Hearing was evaluated with electrocochleography (ECoG).
Results: For control animals, vibration resulted in an average immediate threshold shift of 42 +/- 26 dB. NAC provided no protective benefit in animals subjected to VHL, regardless of the delivery method, with average threshold shifts varying from 38 to 56 dB across groups. NAC injection through the round window membrane was toxic, causing a ECoG threshold shift of >25 dB. In BDNF+CNTF(Ax1)-treated animals, immediate hearing loss was similar to that in control animals. There was a trend of threshold recovery by 1 day after vibration; however, the improvement was not statistically significant, nor was there a significant difference in 1-day thresholds across groups.
Conclusions: Local infusion of BDNF and CNTF(Ax1) may enhance the rate of recovery from VHL, compared to control animals. In contrast, NAC had no effect on VHL, and when delivered by RWM injection, was actually toxic to the inner ear.
Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel
Similar articles
-
Sensorineural hearing loss after vibration: an animal model for evaluating prevention and treatment of inner ear hearing loss.Acta Otolaryngol. 2001 Jan;121(2):143-8. doi: 10.1080/000164801300043244. Acta Otolaryngol. 2001. PMID: 11349766
-
Antioxidant treatment reduces blast-induced cochlear damage and hearing loss.Hear Res. 2012 Mar;285(1-2):29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.01.013. Epub 2012 Feb 6. Hear Res. 2012. PMID: 22326291
-
[Synergetic protective effects of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor combined with neurotrophin-3 in F-actin on hair cell after noise trauma].Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 2001 Oct;36(5):342-5. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 2001. PMID: 12761941 Chinese.
-
The effect of acoustic trauma on the tectorial membrane, stereocilia, and hearing sensitivity: possible mechanisms underlying damage, recovery, and protection.Scand Audiol Suppl. 1988;27:1-45. Scand Audiol Suppl. 1988. PMID: 3043645 Review.
-
Inner ear therapy for neural preservation.Audiol Neurootol. 2006;11(6):343-56. doi: 10.1159/000095896. Epub 2006 Sep 21. Audiol Neurootol. 2006. PMID: 16988498 Review.
Cited by
-
Soft cochlear implantation: rationale for the surgical approach.Trends Amplif. 2009 Jun;13(2):124-38. doi: 10.1177/1084713809336422. Trends Amplif. 2009. PMID: 19447766 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Advances and Challenges in Pharmaceutical Therapies to Prevent and Repair Cochlear Injuries From Noise.Front Cell Neurosci. 2019 Jun 26;13:285. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00285. eCollection 2019. Front Cell Neurosci. 2019. PMID: 31297051 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous