Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Jul-Aug;141(4):465-71.
doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41560.

[Biomechanical properties of cartilage repair tissue after different cartilage repair procedures in sheep]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Comparative Study

[Biomechanical properties of cartilage repair tissue after different cartilage repair procedures in sheep]

[Article in German]
M Russlies et al. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2003 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical quality of cartilage and repair tissue in a sheep's knee. 4 standardized 7 mm defects were created on the medial femoral condyle and on the patellar groove (n = 22). These were treated with 4 different cartilage repair procedures and examined 1 year later.

Material and methods: The different groups were: (1) a cell-seeded collagen type-I/III-membrane (Chondro Gide(R)) glued into the defect; (2) a collagen type-I/III-membrane, sutured and cells injected underneath; (3) an engineered, cell-seeded collagen type-II-membrane, glued; (4) periosteum sutured and cells injected underneath; (5) CONTROLS: healthy contra-lateral knees. Indentation tests were performed to reveal the biomechanical capacity. From creep indentation over 35 s a "25-s creep index" was calculated. A high creep index means that the cartilage can undergo greater and faster compression.

Results: The repair tissue was significantly thinner than the normal cartilage. The mean creep index of all repair tissues was measured at 111 and 125, respectively (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences among the treated groups.

Conclusion: In this animal study, none of the induced repair tissues was biomechanically comparable to genuine articular cartilage.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources