Effective long-term left atrial pacing using regular screw-in leads implanted within the coronary sinus
- PMID: 12930503
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.t01-1-00283.x
Effective long-term left atrial pacing using regular screw-in leads implanted within the coronary sinus
Abstract
Passive-fixation leads positioned inside the coronary sinus (CS) have been found to be effective in LA pacing and sensing, but their use is limited by a high incidence of early and late dislodgment. Since anatomic studies have shown that the proximal part of the CS is surrounded by a relatively thick musculature, the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of acute and chronic coronary sinus pacing via regular screw-in leads positioned within the first centimeters of the CS were evaluated as compared to passive-fixation leads. Thirty-three patients (21 men, age 62 +/- 10 years) underwent dual chamber pacemaker implantation with LA pacing obtained via passive-fixation leads (7 patients) or regular screw-in leads (26 patients). The former approach was prematurely abandoned because of a high rate of acute and late lead dislodgment (42%). The chronic pacing threshold was 1.7 +/- 1.0 V at 0.67-ms pulse width and 1.47 +/- 1.3 V at 0.5-ms pulse width for passive- and active-fixation leads, respectively. In the CS active-fixation lead group, no postoperative pericardial effusion, CS lead dislodgment, nor diaphragmatic stimulation were observed. In this last group, steroid eluting leads (14 patients) have a statistically lower pacing threshold than noneluting steroid leads (12 patients) (0.88 +/- 0.23 vs 2.29 +/- 1.68 V, P = 0.011) at long-term follow-up. The use of regular screw-in leads implanted within the CS allows effective and safe long-term LA pacing without risk of dislodgment.
Similar articles
-
Surgical epicardial left ventricular lead versus coronary sinus lead placement in biventricular pacing.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Feb;27(2):235-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.09.029. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005. PMID: 15691676
-
Permanent left atrial pacing with a specifically designed coronary sinus lead.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Nov;20(11):2755-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb05433.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997. PMID: 9392806
-
A comparison between passive and active fixation leads in the coronary sinus for biatrial pacing: initial experience.Europace. 2000 Jul;2(3):228-32. doi: 10.1053/eupc.2000.0105. Europace. 2000. PMID: 11227593 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of prophylactic epicardial pacing leads in children and young adults.Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Jul;78(1):197-202; discussion 202-3. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.02.008. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004. PMID: 15223427 Review.
-
Properties of ultrasonically marked leads.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1989 Aug;12(8):1369-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1989.tb05051.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1989. PMID: 2476761 Review.
Cited by
-
Right versus left atrial pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (Riverleft study): study protocol for randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2014 Nov 17;15:445. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-445. Trials. 2014. PMID: 25403703 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical