Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Aug;29(4):220-4.
doi: 10.1136/jme.29.4.220.

Confidentiality and the ethics of medical ethics

Affiliations

Confidentiality and the ethics of medical ethics

W A Rogers et al. J Med Ethics. 2003 Aug.

Abstract

In this paper we consider the use of cases in medical ethics research and teaching. To date, there has been little discussion about the consent or confidentiality requirements that ought to govern the use of cases in these areas. This is in marked contrast to the requirements for consent to publish cases in clinical journals, or to use personal information in research. There are a number of reasons why it might be difficult to obtain consent to use cases in ethics. Many cases concern people who are incompetent, and thus unable to give consent. Often the material is of a sensitive nature, it is not clear who should give consent, or the ethicist has no access to those involved. We argue that the use of cases in ethics research and teaching can be justified by appeal to the public interest argument, and suggest a number of areas for discussion and clarification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lancet. 2001 Mar 31;357(9261):1033-5 - PubMed
    1. J Med Ethics. 2001 Jun;27(3):198-202 - PubMed
    1. Med Educ. 2001 Sep;35(9):862-6 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1998 Mar 28;316(7136):1001-2 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1998 Mar 28;316(7136):1002-3 - PubMed

Publication types