Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Jun;10(3):453-7.
doi: 10.1177/152660280301000309.

Anatomical suitability of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms for endovascular repair

Affiliations

Anatomical suitability of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms for endovascular repair

Daniel F G Rose et al. J Endovasc Ther. 2003 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the anatomical suitability of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) for emergency endovascular repair.

Methods: All cases (46 patients [35 men; mean age 74 years, range 54-85]) in which computed tomographic angiography (CTA) confirmed AAA rupture over a 5-year period at our university hospital were reviewed for anatomical suitability for endovascular repair. Measurements were made by a radiologist experienced in anatomical assessment of CT criteria for elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

Results: The mean aneurysm neck length was 18 mm (range 0-59); 17 were conical, 13 straight, 4 barrel, and 6 reverse conical. Six cases had no proximal neck. Overall, 37 (80%) patients were unsuitable for EVAR according to our criteria. Nearly half the patients (22, 48%) had > or =2 adverse features. Unsuitable neck morphology (35, 76%) was the primary reason for exclusion, but CIA aneurysm (10, 22%) and EIA tortuosity (7, 15%) were secondary adverse features.

Conclusions: With current stent-graft design, the majority of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms are anatomically unsuitable for endovascular repair.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources