The antiemetic efficacy of droperidol added to morphine patient-controlled analgesia: a randomized, controlled, multicenter dose-finding study
- PMID: 12933408
- DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000078806.53162.89
The antiemetic efficacy of droperidol added to morphine patient-controlled analgesia: a randomized, controlled, multicenter dose-finding study
Erratum in
- Anesth Analg. 2004 Jan;98(1):88
Abstract
The antiemetic dose response of droperidol when it is added to patient-controlled analgesia with morphine is not well known. We randomly allocated adults who received postoperative morphine patient-controlled analgesia (1-mg bolus, 5-min lockout) to one of four regimens: no droperidol (control) or 5, 15, or 50 micro g of droperidol per milligram of morphine. Efficacy and adverse effects were recorded during 24 h and were analyzed with number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm with 95% confidence intervals. Data from 82 controls, 82 patients receiving droperidol 5 micro g, 82 receiving droperidol 15 micro g, and 83 receiving droperidol 50 micro g were analyzed. Average consumption of droperidol per 24 h was 0.2 mg with the 5- micro g regimen, 0.61 mg with the 15- micro g regimen, and 2.04 mg with the 50- micro g regimen. In controls, the incidence of nausea was 48.8%; with droperidol 5 micro g, it was 42.7% (NNT compared with control, 16 [95% confidence interval, 4.7 to -11]); with 15 micro g, it was 32.9% (NNT, 6.3 [3.3-100]); and with 50 micro g, it was 21.7% (NNT, 3.7 [2.4 to 7.6]). In controls, the incidence of vomiting was 24.4%; with droperidol 5 micro g, it was 23.2% (NNT compared with control, 82 [7 to -8.5]); with 15 micro g, it was 22.0% (NNT, 41 [6.5 to -9.6]); and with 50 micro g, it was 12% (NNT, 8.1 [4.2-142]). In controls, the incidence of pruritus was 12.2%; with droperidol 5 micro g, it was 6.1% (NNT compared with control, 16 [6.7 to -37]); and with 15 and 50 micro g, it was 2.4% (NNT, 10 [5.7-52]). In controls, the incidence of sedation was 2.4%; with droperidol 5 micro g, it was 8.5% (number needed to harm (NNH) compared with control, 16 [7.7 to -123]); with 15 micro g, it was 6.1% (NNH, 27 [10 to -40]); and with 50 micro g, it was 18.1% (NNH, 6.4 [4.1-15]). There were no extrapyramidal symptoms and no cardiac adverse events. There was no difference in patient satisfaction. The optimal antiemetic dose of droperidol is 15-50 micro g/mg of morphine. Larger doses may have more antivomiting efficacy but are likely to be unacceptably sedating.
Similar articles
-
Addition of droperidol to morphine administered by the patient-controlled analgesia method: what is the optimal dose?Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1998 May;15(3):304-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2346.1998.00293.x. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1998. PMID: 9649989 Clinical Trial.
-
Adding droperidol to morphine patient-controlled analgesia: effect on nausea and vomiting.J Med Assoc Thai. 2002 Sep;85 Suppl 3:S923-33. J Med Assoc Thai. 2002. PMID: 12452231 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and adverse effects of prophylactic antiemetics during patient-controlled analgesia therapy: a quantitative systematic review.Anesth Analg. 1999 Jun;88(6):1354-61. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199906000-00030. Anesth Analg. 1999. PMID: 10357345
-
A dose ranging study of dexamethasone for preventing patient-controlled analgesia-related nausea and vomiting: a comparison of droperidol with saline.Anesth Analg. 2004 Apr;98(4):1066-1071. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000105875.05357.A0. Anesth Analg. 2004. PMID: 15041600 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy, dose-response, and adverse effects of droperidol for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.Can J Anaesth. 2000 Jun;47(6):537-51. doi: 10.1007/BF03018945. Can J Anaesth. 2000. PMID: 10875717 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of multimodal intervention on postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopy.J Int Med Res. 2019 May;47(5):2026-2033. doi: 10.1177/0300060519835700. Epub 2019 Mar 18. J Int Med Res. 2019. PMID: 30885027 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
[Postoperative nausea and vomiting].Anaesthesist. 2004 Apr;53(4):377-89; quiz 390-1. doi: 10.1007/s00101-004-0662-8. Anaesthesist. 2004. PMID: 15190867 Review. German.
-
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD004125. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004125.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 17;7:CD004125. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004125.pub3. PMID: 16856030 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Prophylaxis of intra- and postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients during cesarean section in spinal anesthesia.Med Sci Monit. 2013 Nov 14;19:993-1000. doi: 10.12659/MSM.889597. Med Sci Monit. 2013. PMID: 24226381 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Quetiapine-Related Deaths: In Search of a Surrogate Endpoint.Toxics. 2024 Jan 3;12(1):37. doi: 10.3390/toxics12010037. Toxics. 2024. PMID: 38250993 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Walder B, Schafer M, Henzi I, Tramèr MR. Efficacy and safety of patient-controlled opioid analgesia for acute postoperative pain: a quantitative systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001; 45: 795–804.
-
- Tramèr MR, Walder B. Efficacy and adverse effects of prophylactic antiemetics during PCA therapy: a quantitative systematic review. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 1354–61.
-
- Lamond CT, Robinson DL, Boyd JD, Cashman JN. Addition of droperidol to morphine administered by the patient-controlled analgesia method: what is the optimal dose? Eur J Anaesthesiol 1998; 15: 304–9.
-
- Cook RJ, Sackett DL. The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect. BMJ 1995; 310: 452–4.
-
- Altman D. Confidence intervals for the number needed to treat. BMJ 1998; 317: 1309–12.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical