Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Jul-Aug;119(4):28-31.

[Bifocal contact lenses as a correction method in presbyopia]

[Article in Russian]
  • PMID: 12934502
Comparative Study

[Bifocal contact lenses as a correction method in presbyopia]

[Article in Russian]
S E Avetisov et al. Vestn Oftalmol. 2003 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

A study aimed at assessing the efficiency of presbyopia correction by bifocal contact lenses (BCL) was undertaken; it envisaged a comprehensive evaluation of subjective data provided by patients and measurements of a number of functional parameters of the visual quality for far and near, including mono- and binocular measurements with BCL of different constructions versus a maximal sphero-cylindrical spectacle correction for far and for near. Soft Acuvue Bifocal BCL as well as soft and rigid BCL manufactured in the optical-and-mechanical laboratory of the Research Institute for Eye Disease of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences and Russian-made and imported bifocal soft and rigid lenses, respectively, were made use of in the study. A reduced contrast sensitivity (mainly in high frequencies) to 7% with Russian-made BCL, to 12.5% with Acuvue Bifocal BCL, to 8.7% with monofocal BCL and to 13.4% with the "mono-vision" system was registered. A decreased visual working ability to 13% with soft bifocal Russian-made BCL, to 17.3% with Acuvue Bifocal BCL and to 20.7% with the "mono-vision" system was detected versus the spectacle correction. A reduction by 25% was noted in the stereoscopic vision indices with the "mono-vision" system. A study of sensitivity to dazzling did not show any statistically reliable differences between various correction types.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Optical interventions for presbyopia.
    Lam D, Nagra M, Michaud L, Obinwanne CJ, Orgill M, Koschmeder J, Ekpenyong BN, Khan R, Ng SM, Tomiyama ES. Lam D, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6(6):CD016285. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016285. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 40539510 Free PMC article.

LinkOut - more resources