Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2003 Sep;88(9):778-83.
doi: 10.1136/adc.88.9.778.

Maternal recall of exclusive breast feeding duration

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Maternal recall of exclusive breast feeding duration

R M Bland et al. Arch Dis Child. 2003 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Both the pattern and duration of breast feeding are important determinants of health outcomes. In vertical HIV transmission research, reliable documentation of early breast feeding practices is important in order to correctly attribute postnatal transmission to feeding pattern.

Aims: To validate methods of collecting data on the duration of exclusive breast feeding (EBF) in an area of South Africa with a high HIV prevalence rate.

Methods: A total of 130 mothers were interviewed weekly, postnatally. At every interview a 48 hour and a seven day recall breast feeding history were taken. A subset of 70 mothers also received two intermediate visits per week during which additional 48 hour, non-overlapping, recall interviews were conducted. Ninety three infants were revisited at 6-9 months of age when mothers' recall of EBF duration from birth was documented. The different methods of recalling EBF status were compared against an a priori "best comparison" in each case.

Results: Reported breast feeding practices over the previous 48 hours did not reflect EBF practices since birth (specificity 65-89%; positive predictive value 31-48%). Six month EBF duration recall was equally poor (sensitivity at 2 weeks 79%; specificity 40%). Seven day recall accurately reflected EBF practices compared with thrice weekly recall over the same time period (sensitivity 96%, specificity 94%).

Conclusions: 48 hour EBF status does not accurately reflect feeding practices since birth. Long term recall data on EBF are even more inaccurate. We recommend that data on duration of EBF be collected prospectively at intervals of no longer than one week.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cohort profile: longitudinal breast feeding study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Maternal recall of duration of EBF by mothers interviewed 6–9 months post-delivery compared to the longitudinal data collected at weekly intervals.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. JAMA. 2000 Mar 1;283(9):1167-74 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1999 Aug 7;354(9177):471-6 - PubMed
    1. Acta Paediatr. 2002;91(6):704-11 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 2003 Mar 12;289(10):1258-64 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1986 Aug 15;256(7):887-92 - PubMed

Publication types