Is elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation better than conventional mechanical ventilation in very low birth weight infants?
- PMID: 12937116
- PMCID: PMC1719656
- DOI: 10.1136/adc.88.9.833
Is elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation better than conventional mechanical ventilation in very low birth weight infants?
Similar articles
-
First intention high-frequency oscillatory and conventional mechanical ventilation in premature infants without antenatal glucocorticoid prophylaxis.Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012 Jan;13(1):72-9. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e318219673e. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012. PMID: 21499177 Clinical Trial.
-
A multicenter randomized trial of high frequency oscillatory ventilation as compared with conventional mechanical ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory failure.Early Hum Dev. 1993 Feb;32(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/0378-3782(93)90088-c. Early Hum Dev. 1993. PMID: 8462430 Clinical Trial.
-
Neuromotor outcome at 2 years of very preterm infants who were treated with high-frequency oscillatory ventilation or conventional ventilation for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.Pediatrics. 2007 Apr;119(4):e860-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-2082. Epub 2007 Mar 5. Pediatrics. 2007. PMID: 17339385 Clinical Trial.
-
One-sided high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in the management of an acquired neonatal lobar emphysema: a case report and review.J Perinatol. 2001 Jan-Feb;21(1):61-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7200488. J Perinatol. 2001. PMID: 11268869 Review.
-
Elective high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants.Neonatology. 2013;103(1):7-8; discussion 8-9. doi: 10.1159/000338553. Epub 2012 Aug 30. Neonatology. 2013. PMID: 23037971 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical