A 3-Dimensional Analysis of Face-Mask Removal Tools in Inducing Helmet Movement
- PMID: 12937432
- PMCID: PMC164342
A 3-Dimensional Analysis of Face-Mask Removal Tools in Inducing Helmet Movement
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of specific face-mask removal tools during football helmet face-mask retraction using 3-dimensional (3-D) video. DESIGN AND SETTING: Four different tools were used: the anvil pruner (AP), polyvinyl chloride pipe cutters (PVC), Face Mask (FM) Extractor (FME), and Trainer's Angel (TA). Subjects retracted a face mask once with each tool. SUBJECTS: Eleven certified athletic trainers served as subjects and were recruited from among local sports medicine professionals. MEASUREMENTS: We analyzed a sample of movement by 3-D techniques during the retraction process. Movement of the head in 3 planes and time to retract the face mask were also assessed. All results were analyzed with a simple repeated-measures one-way multivariate analysis of variance. An overall efficiency score was calculated for each tool. RESULTS: The AP allowed subjects to perform the face-mask removal task the fastest. Face mask removal with the AP was significantly faster than with the PVC and TA and significantly faster with the TA than the PVC. The PVC and AP created significantly more movement than the FME and TA when planes were combined. No significant differences were noted among tools for flexion-extension, rotation, or lateral flexion. The AP had an efficiency score of 14; FME, 15; TA, 18; and PVC, 35. CONCLUSIONS: The subjects performed the face-mask removal task in the least amount of time with the AP. They completed the task with the least amount of combined movement using the FME. The AP and FME had nearly identical overall efficiency scores for movement and time.
Figures







Similar articles
-
Face-Mask Removal: Movement and Time Associated With Cutting of the Loop Straps.J Athl Train. 2003 Jun;38(2):120-125. J Athl Train. 2003. PMID: 12937522 Free PMC article.
-
The efficiency of tools used to retract a football helmet face mask.J Athl Train. 1997 Jul;32(3):211-5. J Athl Train. 1997. PMID: 16558451 Free PMC article.
-
Removal Tools are Faster and Produce Less Force and Torque on the Helmet Than Cutting Tools During Face-Mask Retraction.J Athl Train. 2002 Sep;37(3):246-251. J Athl Train. 2002. PMID: 12937580 Free PMC article.
-
Face masks and basketball: NCAA division I consumer trends and a review of over-the-counter face masks.Laryngoscope. 2016 May;126(5):1054-60. doi: 10.1002/lary.25584. Epub 2015 Sep 7. Laryngoscope. 2016. PMID: 26344194 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Face mask removal in the spine-injured football player: a review.Emerg Med Serv. 2002 Oct;31(10):175-6, 178. Emerg Med Serv. 2002. PMID: 12683297 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
The influence of various factors on high school football helmet face mask removal: a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis.J Athl Train. 2007 Jan-Mar;42(1):11-9, discussion 20. J Athl Train. 2007. PMID: 17597938 Free PMC article.
-
Emergency face-mask removal effectiveness: a comparison of traditional and nontraditional football helmet face-mask attachment systems.J Athl Train. 2010 Nov-Dec;45(6):560-9. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-45.6.560. J Athl Train. 2010. PMID: 21062179 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A comparison of head movement during back boarding by motorized spine-board and log-roll techniques.J Athl Train. 2005 Jul-Sep;40(3):162-8. J Athl Train. 2005. PMID: 16284635 Free PMC article.
-
Football face-mask removal with a cordless screwdriver on helmets used for at least one season of play.J Athl Train. 2005 Jul-Sep;40(3):169-73. J Athl Train. 2005. PMID: 16284636 Free PMC article.
-
National athletic trainers' association position statement: acute management of the cervical spine-injured athlete.J Athl Train. 2009 May-Jun;44(3):306-31. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-44.3.306. J Athl Train. 2009. PMID: 19478836 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Donaldson W F, 3rd, Lauerman W C, Heil B, Blanc R, Swenson T. Helmet and shoulder pad removal from a player with suspected cervical spine injury: a cadaveric model. Spine. 1998;23:1729–1733. - PubMed
-
- Gastel J A, Palumbo M A, Hulstyn M J, Fadale P D, Lucas P. Emergency removal of football equipment: a cadaveric cervical spine injury model. Ann Emerg Med. 1998;32:411–417. - PubMed
-
- Palumbo M A, Hulstyn M J, Fadale P D, O'Brien T, Shall L. The effect of protective football equipment on the alignment of the injured cervical spine: radiographic analysis in a cadaveric model. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24:446–453. - PubMed
-
- Swenson T M, Lauerman W C, Blanc R O, Donaldson WF, 3rd, Fu F H. Cervical spine alignment in the immobilized football player: radiographic analysis before and after helmet removal. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25:226–230. - PubMed
-
- Feld F, Blanc R. Immobilizing the spine injured football player. J Emerg Med Serv. 1987;12:38–40.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources