Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Sep;37(3):246-251.

Removal Tools are Faster and Produce Less Force and Torque on the Helmet Than Cutting Tools During Face-Mask Retraction

Affiliations

Removal Tools are Faster and Produce Less Force and Torque on the Helmet Than Cutting Tools During Face-Mask Retraction

Heather L Jenkins et al. J Athl Train. 2002 Sep.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the retraction time, forces, and torques applied to the football helmet during removal of the face mask with different face-mask removal tools. DESIGN AND SETTING: Subjects retracted the face mask of a football helmet mounted to a force platform in a laboratory setting. They removed a standard face mask by cutting or removing (or both) the lateral plastic loop straps using 4 different tools: the Trainer's Angel (TA), FM Extractor (FM), power screwdriver (SD), and Quick Release System (QR) in a counterbalanced fashion. SUBJECTS: Eighteen certified athletic trainers participated in this study. MEASUREMENTS: We started measuring time when the subject picked up the tool and ended when the face mask was in a fully retracted position. Maximum forces and torques were measured from the force platform during the retraction process. RESULTS: The SD and QR retracted the face mask significantly faster than the TA and FM. Forces producing superior-inferior translation were least with the SD. The SD and QR produced less lateral translation and rotation and lateral flexion moment than the TA and FM. The FM produced less torque in the lateral flexion moment than the TA. CONCLUSIONS: Tools that removed the loop straps (SD, QR) were faster and produced less force and torque on the helmet than the tools that cut through the loop straps (TA, FM).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The helmet mounted on the forceplate.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean time, in seconds, for removal of the face mask with the 4 tools. TA indicates Trainer's Angel; FM, FM Extractor; SD, screwdriver; and QR, Quick Release System. Error bars represent standard deviations. ∗SD and QR took significantly less time than TA and FM. †FM took significantly less time than TA (P < .05).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean force, in Newtons, applied to the helmet during removal with the 4 tools. TA indicates Trainer's Angel; FM, FM Extractor; SD, screwdriver; and QR, Quick Release System. Error bars represent standard deviations. ∗SD produced significantly less force than TA and FM. †SD and QR produced significantly less force than TA and FM (P < .05).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean torque, in Newton-meters, applied to the helmet during removal with the 4 tools. Error bars represent standard deviations. TA indicates Trainer's Angel; FM, FM Extractor; SD, screwdriver; and QR, Quick Release System. ∗SD and QR produced less torque than TA and FM. †SD and QR produced significantly less torque than TA and FM. ‡ FM produced significantly less torque than TA (P < .05).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bailes J E, Hadley M N, Quigley M R, Sonntag V K, Cerullo L J. Management of athletic injuries of the cervical spine and spinal cord. Neurosurgery. 1991;29:491–497. - PubMed
    1. Muller F O. Fatalities from head and cervical spine injuries occurring in tackle football: 50 years' experience. Clin Sports Med. 1998;17:169–182. - PubMed
    1. Albright J A. Cervical spine injuries in football. Conn Med. 1976;40:677–679. - PubMed
    1. Bailes J E, Maroon J C. Management of cervical spine injuries in athletes. Clin Sports Med. 1989;8:43–58. - PubMed
    1. Torg J S. Epidemiology, pathomechanics, and prevention of athletic injuries to the cervical spine. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1985;17:295–303. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources