Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Sep;6(3):189-97.
doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00231.x.

Evolving the multiple roles of 'patients' in health-care research: reflections after involvement in a trial of shared decision-making

Affiliations

Evolving the multiple roles of 'patients' in health-care research: reflections after involvement in a trial of shared decision-making

Hazel Thornton et al. Health Expect. 2003 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: This paper offers 'consumer-led' reflections by steering group members of a patient-centred research study involving consumer advocates, patients' associations and patients, throughout the whole study, from pre- to post-study phases. ORIGINAL STUDY DESIGN: The study: 'Shared decision making and risk communication in general practice' incorporated systematic reviews, psychometric evaluation of outcome measures, and quantitative, qualitative and health economic analyses of a cluster randomized trial of professional skill development, all informed by consumer and patient engagement.

Setting and participants: The work was produced by a wide collaboration led by researchers from the Department of General Practice, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, including a consumers' advisory group and a patients' association. The study participants were 20 general practitioners from Gwent, their practice staff, and almost 800 patients at these practices.

Discussion: Consumers and patients contributed to several stages of the research from inception and design, securing of funding, implementation of the protocol, and interpretation and dissemination of the findings. 'Patient involvement' research initiatives that include an equally wide variety of 'user' participants as 'health-professional' participants, accountable to a 'Health in Partnership' funded project, require a user-led viewpoint to be presented and disseminated. This paper presents reflections on the processes of the research, the interpretations of study findings by the involved parties, and notes how this model is fundamental to effective research in the field of patient-centred health care if future practice, policy and research are to change.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Dieppe P, Refferty A‐M, Kitson A. The clinical encounter – the focal point of patient centred‐care. Health Expectations, 2002; 5: 279–281. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Majeed A. Ten ways to improve information technology in the NHS. BMJ, 2003; 320: 202–204. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coulter A. The Autonomous Patient. Ending Paternalism in Medical Care. The John Fry Fellowship. London: Nuffield Trust, 2002.
    1. Marteau TM, Kinmonth AL. Screening for cardiovascular risk: public health imperative or matter for individual informed choice? BMJ, 2002; 325: 78–80. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Skrabanek P. The Death of Humane Medicine and the Rise of Coercive Healthism. London: The Social Affairs Unit, 1994.