Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2003 Sep;6(3):255-68.
doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00240.x.

On what basis should the effectiveness of decision aids be judged?

Affiliations
Review

On what basis should the effectiveness of decision aids be judged?

Andrew D M Kennedy. Health Expect. 2003 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: Attempts to synthesize the evidence on the effects of decision aids have been hampered by the lack of consensus regarding how such effectiveness should be measured. This paper seeks to describe and critically assess the range of measures of effectiveness used in randomized controlled trials of decision aids.

Search strategy: The published systematic reviews of the field were used to identify primary studies evaluating the effects of decision aids.

Inclusion criteria: Non-randomized trials were excluded from this review. As were abstracts and theses of subsequently published studies, methodological papers and reports of subgroups of a study's main publication.

Main results: A wide range of measures were used to evaluate the effectiveness of decision aids. The most commonly used measures sought to assess treatment decisions, patient's knowledge and the decision-making process. This pattern was repeated when primary measures of effectiveness were examined. No study attempted to measure the extent to which decisions made were consistent with patient's values.

Conclusions: Within the current literature there is little consensus on what the aims of decision aids should be. If we can agree that the aim of a decision aid is to help patients make specific personal treatment choices, then evaluations of decision aids should measure the primary effectiveness of their interventions in terms of the extent to which they enable patient's to undergo treatments that agree with their values.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Herrera AJ, Cochran B, Herrera A, Wallace B. Parental information and circumcision in highly motivated couples with higher education. Pediatrics, 1983; 71: 233–234. - PubMed
    1. O'Connor AM, Rostom A, Fiset V, Tetroe J, Entwistle V, Llewellyn‐Thomas H. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. BMJ, 1999; 319: 731–734. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shepperd S, Charnock D, Gann B. Helping patients access high quality health information. BMJ, 1999; 319: 764–766. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Veatch RM. Models for ethical medicine in a revolutionary age. Hastings Centre Report, 1972; 2: 5–7. - PubMed
    1. Hope T. The Use of Evidence Based Information for Enhancing Patient Choice. Oxford: Anglia and Oxford Regional Health Authority, 1995.