Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992 Sep 12;305(6854):627-30.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6854.627.

Developing a district diabetic register

Affiliations

Developing a district diabetic register

S D Burnett et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To compile a district wide diabetic register of all diabetic patients registered with general practitioners in the catchment area of a single district general hospital and to compare different approaches to identifying patients.

Design: Information for a register was obtained from general practitioners' practice registers, the Prescription Pricing Authority, and hospital diabetic clinic records.

Setting: Catchment area of an inner London district general hospital with a large diabetic clinic.

Subjects: All patients with a diagnosis of diabetes resident in or attending general practitioners or hospital clinics in the district or its catchment area.

Main outcome measures: Prevalence of diabetes, population of patients elicited by different approaches, proportion attending the local district general hospital, cost of using prescription returns for identifying diabetic patients.

Results: 4674 patients with diabetes were identified from all sources of information, which corresponds to a mean of 22.4 patients per general practitioner and the prevalence of known diabetes of 1.17%. 39.4% of patients identified had Prescription Pricing Authority returns and 42.8% of patients appeared on practices' diabetic registers. Only 56.5% of patients identified attended the district general hospital. For practices where all sources of information were available, practice registers included 60.4% of all patients, and prescription returns and the clinic register identified 64.9% and 40.6% respectively. The cost of using prescription returns to identify patients not detected in other ways was 6.37 pounds per patient.

Conclusion: The task of developing district diabetic registers may prove, even in one cross sectional attempt, a major task in many inner city health districts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1980 Dec;34(4):277-80 - PubMed
    1. Diabet Med. 1991 Oct;8(8):770-2 - PubMed
    1. Diabet Med. 1990 Jul;7(6):558-60 - PubMed
    1. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1989 Mar;43(1):25-8 - PubMed
    1. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987 Sep;37(302):389 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources