Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2003 Oct;4(5):363-72.
doi: 10.1007/s11864-003-0037-4.

Nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Affiliations
Review

Nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Steven C Campbell et al. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2003 Oct.

Abstract

Patients presenting with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) face a dismal prognosis, with a median survival time of only 6 to 12 months and a 2-year survival rate of 10% to 20%. RCC is notoriously chemorefractory, and immunotherapy is associated with total response rates of less than 20% and complete response rates of less than 5%. Therefore, surgery has continued to play a prominent role in the management of patients with metastatic RCC. Recent randomized prospective trials suggest a survival advantage for cytoreductive nephrectomy, and some patients with advanced RCC may also achieve palliation. Patients with limited and resectable metastases should be considered for combined nephrectomy and metastasectomy. The other main option for patients with advanced RCC is systemic immunotherapy followed by assessment for surgical consolidation, but responses in the primary tumor are uncommon and results with this pathway have not been encouraging. Tumor embolization can be a valuable palliative adjunct for some patients with metastatic RCC. Cytoreductive nephrectomy represents the most aggressive pathway for patients with metastatic RCC. Although cytoreductive nephrectomy can extend survival by approximately 50% for many patients, it can be associated with morbidity and delay in administration of systemic therapy. Therefore, patient selection, taking into account performance status and sites and burden of disease, which are well-established prognostic factors for patients with metastatic RCC, is of paramount importance in managing this challenging group of patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ann Surg Oncol. 1994 Jul;1(4):345-52 - PubMed
    1. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1982;100:641-59 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2001 Dec 6;345(23 ):1655-9 - PubMed
    1. Urology. 1985 Mar;25(3):248-50 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2003 Mar;169(3):909-16 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources