Customizing fetal biometric charts
- PMID: 12942500
- DOI: 10.1002/uog.196
Customizing fetal biometric charts
Abstract
Objective: To study the effects of maternal and pregnancy characteristics on fetal biometric size using longitudinal ultrasound measurements and to construct customized models for fetal biometric size charts.
Methods: A cohort of 533 healthy pregnant women with normal singleton pregnancies were recruited for regular ultrasound examination for fetal biometry between 24 and 40 weeks' gestation. Multilevel modeling was used to construct models of fetal head size, femur length and abdominal circumference. Variables of maternal and pregnancy characteristics including booking weight and height, age, parity and fetal sex were included in the construction of the customized fetal biometric size charts.
Results: Increased fetal head size and abdominal circumference were significantly associated with extremes of maternal age. Maternal height had a statistically significant influence on biparietal diameter. Maternal booking weight had an influence on fetal abdominal circumference and femur length. Fetal sex was found to have a statistically significant influence on the final regression models of biparietal diameter, head circumference and femur length. Parity had an influence on fetal head circumference and abdominal circumference.
Conclusions: Maternal and pregnancy characteristics have a significant influence on in-utero fetal biometry. We produced models to construct customized fetal biometric size charts. Further validation studies are necessary to evaluate the clinical usefulness of such customized fetal biometric size charts.
Copyright 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Determination of gestational age after the 24th week of gestation from fetal kidney length measurements.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;19(6):592-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00704.x. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002. PMID: 12047540
-
Reference charts and equations of Korean fetal biometry.Prenat Diagn. 2007 Jun;27(6):545-51. doi: 10.1002/pd.1729. Prenat Diagn. 2007. PMID: 17431930
-
Fetal biometry charts for normal pregnant women in northeastern Thailand.J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Oct;90(10):1963-9. J Med Assoc Thai. 2007. PMID: 18041409
-
Fetal biometry: relevance in obstetrical practice.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;55(1):281-7. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3182446e9b. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012. PMID: 22343244 Review.
-
Biometric assessment.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Dec;23(6):819-31. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.06.007. Epub 2009 Jul 26. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009. PMID: 19632901 Review.
Cited by
-
Stillbirth and the small fetus: use of a sex-specific versus a non-sex-specific growth standard.J Perinatol. 2015 Aug;35(8):566-9. doi: 10.1038/jp.2015.17. Epub 2015 Mar 19. J Perinatol. 2015. PMID: 25789818 Free PMC article.
-
Reference values of fetal ultrasound biometry: results of a prospective cohort study in Lithuania.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Nov;306(5):1503-1517. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06437-z. Epub 2022 Feb 27. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022. PMID: 35220480
-
Is It Time to Change Our Reference Curve for Femur Length? Using the Z-Score to Select the Best Chart in a Chinese Population.PLoS One. 2016 Jul 26;11(7):e0159733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159733. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27458922 Free PMC article.
-
Scientific basis for standardization of fetal head measurements by ultrasound: a reproducibility study.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jul;48(1):80-5. doi: 10.1002/uog.15956. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27158767 Free PMC article.
-
Investigation of normal organ development with fetal MRI.Eur Radiol. 2007 Oct;17(10):2458-71. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0604-3. Epub 2007 Mar 7. Eur Radiol. 2007. PMID: 17342486 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources