Extent of oesophageal resection for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction
- PMID: 12943624
- DOI: 10.1016/s0748-7983(03)00109-4
Extent of oesophageal resection for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction
Abstract
Aims: The optimal extent of oesophageal resection and surgical approach in patients treated for adenocarcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction (OGJ) are still uncertain. We report the correlations between resection margin involvement and outcome.
Methods: Patients with positive proximal resection margin (PPRM) and those with negative proximal resection margin (NPRM) were compared.
Results: Of 94 patients with macroscopically complete resection, eight were PPRM. There was no difference between the two groups in postoperative mortality or morbidity rates, in anastomotic leakage or in recurrence rates. The median survival in the PPRM group was 11.1 months compared with 36.3 months in the NPRM group (P=0.02). No infiltration was observed in patients whose proximal margin exceeded 7 cm. The extended transthoracic approach was the only prognostic factor for tumours type II (P=0.03, RR=1.4, 95% CI: 1.1-1.8).
Conclusion: Histologic infiltration of oesophageal resection margin influences 5-year survival rate. In adenocarcinomas of the OGJ that can be treated curatively, a transection with a 8 cm oesophagectomy above the tumour in fresh specimen should be performed, and by thoracoabdominal approach for tumours type I and II.
Similar articles
-
Proximal margin length with transhiatal gastrectomy for Siewert type II and III adenocarcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction.Br J Surg. 2013 Jul;100(8):1050-4. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9170. Br J Surg. 2013. PMID: 23754647
-
Improved survival in resected oesophageal and gastric adenocarcinomas over a decade: the Royal Marsden experience 2001-2010.Gastric Cancer. 2016 Oct;19(4):1114-1124. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0561-5. Epub 2015 Nov 5. Gastric Cancer. 2016. PMID: 26541768
-
Surgical approach and results of surgery in adenocarcinoma of the gastro-oesophageal junction.Singapore Med J. 2000 Jan;41(1):14-8. Singapore Med J. 2000. PMID: 10783674
-
Individualised surgical treatment of patients with an adenocarcinoma of the distal oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction.Dig Surg. 2005;22(3):130-4. doi: 10.1159/000086161. Epub 2005 May 16. Dig Surg. 2005. PMID: 15942237 Review.
-
Extent of surgical resection for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas.Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2006 Oct;15(4):781-91. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2006.07.008. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2006. PMID: 17030273 Review.
Cited by
-
A critical appraisal of circumferential resection margins in esophageal carcinoma.Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Mar;17(3):812-20. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0827-4. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010. PMID: 19924487 Free PMC article.
-
Oncologic Quality Indicators in Thoracic Surgery.Thorac Surg Clin. 2017 Aug;27(3):227-244. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2017.04.001. Thorac Surg Clin. 2017. PMID: 28647069 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Positive circumferential resection margin in locally advanced esophageal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Updates Surg. 2022 Aug;74(4):1187-1197. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01256-y. Epub 2022 Feb 25. Updates Surg. 2022. PMID: 35212980
-
Prognostic value of circumferential resection margin in T3N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Ann Transl Med. 2018 Aug;6(15):303. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.06.49. Ann Transl Med. 2018. PMID: 30211191 Free PMC article.
-
Combined total gastrectomy, total esophagectomy, and D2 lymph node dissection with transverse colonic interposition for adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction.Surg Today. 2011 Sep;41(9):1319-23. doi: 10.1007/s00595-010-4412-z. Epub 2011 Aug 26. Surg Today. 2011. PMID: 21874440
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical