Multicenter double-blind randomized parallel-group clinical trial of efficacy of the combination clomipramine (150 mg/day) plus lithium carbonate (750 mg/day) versus clomipramine (150 mg/day) plus placebo in the treatment of unipolar major depression
- PMID: 12943949
- DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0327(02)00086-1
Multicenter double-blind randomized parallel-group clinical trial of efficacy of the combination clomipramine (150 mg/day) plus lithium carbonate (750 mg/day) versus clomipramine (150 mg/day) plus placebo in the treatment of unipolar major depression
Abstract
Background: The therapeutic efficacy of adding lithium to an ongoing antidepressant in resistant depression is well known. However there is less data concerning the efficacy of giving lithium and antidepressant concurrently from the start of treatment.
Methodology: The primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of a combination of clomipramine+lithium (C+L) with that of clomipramine+placebo (C+P) in-patients with unipolar major depression, during the first 11 days of treatment. Secondary objectives were the assessment of effectiveness after 6 weeks and assessment of the safety of the combination clomipramine and lithium carbonate. C+L and C+P groups were compared for 6 weeks in a multicenter randomized trial of 141 patients hospitalized with a DSM-IV diagnosis of major depression. Efficacy was evaluated using the standard MADRS and CGI scales.
Results: Analysis of the 'as treatment ITT' population showed: the percentage reduction in MADRS scores between D0 and D11 in this population was better in the C+L group but not statistically significant (C+L: 32.1 vs. C+P: 27.4, P=0.07). Nevertheless, the comparison of mean MADRS scores showed a significant difference in the C+L group on days 4 (C+L: 25.1 vs. C+P: 27.8) and 7 (C+L: 18.6 vs. C+P: 21.5), P<0.05, and approaching significance on day 11 (C+L: 14.6 vs. C+P 17.2, P=0.054). On day 7, the number of patients in total remission was threefold higher in the C+L group than in the C+P group (15 vs. 4%, P<0.05) and twofold on day 11 (29 vs. 14%, P<0.05). CGI severity score showed C+L was superior to C+P on days 4, 7 and 11 and CGI improvement score was better in C+L group on day 11 (P<0.05). After 6 weeks of treatment no statistical difference was found between the two groups from the clinical point of view. Safety based upon clinical and laboratory parameters was satisfactory in both groups during the 6 weeks of the study.
Limitations: Patients with bipolar disorder, previously treated with clomipramine or with any other mood stabilizers during the previous week; or with suicide attempt during the current episode with a score > or =3 for item 10 of the MADRS were excluded from the study.
Conclusion: The results of this study suggests that lithium slightly to moderately potentiates antidepressant treatment in unipolar non-refractory patients with severe major depression in the first days of treatment but not as significantly as for the bipolar population.
Similar articles
-
A double-blind study of the efficacy and safety of sertraline and clomipramine in outpatients with severe major depression.Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2000 Sep;15(5):263-71. doi: 10.1097/00004850-200015050-00003. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2000. PMID: 10993128 Clinical Trial.
-
A kinetic-pharmacodynamic model for clinical trial simulation of antidepressant action: application to clomipramine-lithium interaction.Contemp Clin Trials. 2007 May;28(3):276-87. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.09.001. Epub 2006 Sep 19. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007. PMID: 17059901
-
Efficacy and safety of lamotrigine as add-on treatment to lithium in bipolar depression: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Feb;70(2):223-31. doi: 10.4088/jcp.08m04152. Epub 2008 Dec 30. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009. PMID: 19200421 Clinical Trial.
-
Novel Augmentation Strategies in Major Depression.Dan Med J. 2017 Apr;64(4):B5338. Dan Med J. 2017. PMID: 28385173 Review.
-
Efficacy of tianeptine in major depressive disorders with or without melancholia.Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 1997 Oct;7 Suppl 3:S341-5. doi: 10.1016/s0924-977x(97)00067-9. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 1997. PMID: 9405961 Review.
Cited by
-
Dose-finding study of fluoxetine and venlafaxine for the treatment of self-injurious and stereotypic behavior in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2009 Mar;48(2):176-84. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2009. PMID: 19383215 Free PMC article.
-
Significant Differences and Experimental Designs Do Not Necessarily Imply Clinical Relevance: Effect Sizes and Causality Claims in Antidepressant Treatments.J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 28;12(9):3181. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093181. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37176620 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A mathematical model for paroxetine antidepressant effect time course and its interaction with pindolol.J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2005 Dec;32(5-6):663-83. doi: 10.1007/s10928-005-0006-6. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2005. PMID: 16307210
-
An Evidence-Based Approach to Augmentation and Combination Strategies for: Treatment-Resistant Depression.Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2006 Jul;3(7):42-61. Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2006. PMID: 20975817 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and Tolerability of Combination Treatments for Major Depression: Antidepressants plus Second-Generation Antipsychotics vs. Esketamine vs. Lithium.J Psychopharmacol. 2021 Aug;35(8):890-900. doi: 10.1177/02698811211013579. Epub 2021 Jul 9. J Psychopharmacol. 2021. PMID: 34238049 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
