Microbubble responses to a similar mechanical index with different real-time perfusion imaging techniques
- PMID: 12946521
- DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(03)00900-1
Microbubble responses to a similar mechanical index with different real-time perfusion imaging techniques
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine differences in contrast enhancement and microbubble destruction rates with current commercially available low-mechanical index (MI) real-time perfusion imaging modalities. A tissue-mimicking phantom was developed that had vessels at 3 cm (near field) and 9 cm (far field) from a real-time transducer. Perfluorocarbon-exposed sonicated dextrose albumin microbubbles (PESDA) were injected proximal to a mixing chamber, and then passed through these vessels while the region was insonified with either pulses of alternating polarity with pulse inversion Doppler (PID) or pulses of alternating amplitude by power modulation (PM) at MIs of 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3. Effluent microbubble concentration, contrast intensity and the slope of digital contrast intensity vs. time were measured. Our results demonstrated that microbubble destruction already occurs with PID at an MI of 0.1. Contrast intensity seen with PID was less than with PM. Therefore, differences in contrast enhancement and microbubble destruction rates occur at a similar MI setting when using different real-time pulse sequence schemes.
Similar articles
-
Differences in definity and optison microbubble destruction rates at a similar mechanical index with different real-time perfusion systems.J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003 Nov;16(11):1178-85. doi: 10.1067/j.echo.2003.07.001. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003. PMID: 14608290
-
On the usefulness of the mechanical index displayed on clinical ultrasound scanners for predicting contrast microbubble destruction.J Ultrasound Med. 2005 Apr;24(4):443-50. doi: 10.7863/jum.2005.24.4.443. J Ultrasound Med. 2005. PMID: 15784762
-
Real-time perfusion imaging with low mechanical index pulse inversion Doppler imaging.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Mar 1;37(3):748-53. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)01204-3. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001. PMID: 11693747
-
Instrumentation for contrast echocardiography.Echocardiography. 2002 Apr;19(3):241-58. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8175.2002.00241.x. Echocardiography. 2002. PMID: 12022934 Review.
-
Italian Society of Cardiovascular Echography (SIEC) Consensus Conference on the state of the art of contrast echocardiography.Ital Heart J. 2004 Apr;5(4):309-34. Ital Heart J. 2004. PMID: 15185894 Review.
Cited by
-
Needle size and injection rate impact microbubble contrast agent population.Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008 Jul;34(7):1182-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.12.018. Epub 2008 Mar 4. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008. PMID: 18295967 Free PMC article.
-
Ultrasound contrast microbubbles in imaging and therapy: physical principles and engineering.Phys Med Biol. 2009 Mar 21;54(6):R27-57. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/6/R01. Epub 2009 Feb 19. Phys Med Biol. 2009. PMID: 19229096 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources