Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2003 Aug 30;327(7413):475.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7413.475.

Effectiveness of dynamic muscle training, relaxation training, or ordinary activity for chronic neck pain: randomised controlled trial

Matti Viljanen  1 , Antti Malmivaara, Jukka Uitti, Marjo Rinne, Pirjo Palmroos, Pekka Laippala
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Effectiveness of dynamic muscle training, relaxation training, or ordinary activity for chronic neck pain: randomised controlled trial

Matti Viljanen et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of dynamic muscle training and relaxation training for chronic neck pain.

Design: Randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Five occupational healthcare centres, Tampere, Finland.

Participants: 393 female office workers (mean age 45 years) with chronic non-specific neck pain randomly assigned to 12 weeks of dynamic muscle training (n = 135) or relaxation training (n = 128), plus one week of reinforcement training six months after baseline; or ordinary activity (control group; n = 130).

Main outcome measure: Change in intensity of neck pain at three, six, and 12 months.

Results: No significant difference was found in neck pain between the groups at follow up. However, the range of motion for cervical rotation and lateral flexion increased more in the training groups than in the control group.

Conclusions: Dynamic muscle training and relaxation training do not lead to better improvements in neck pain compared with ordinary activity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Flow of participants through trial
Fig 2
Fig 2
Intensity of neck pain at baseline and follow up after dynamic muscle training, relaxation training, or ordinary activity
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Bovim G, Schrader H, Sand T. Neck pain in the general population. Spine 1994;19: 1307-9. - PubMed
    1. Coté P, Cassidy JD, Carrol L. The Saskatchewan Health and Back Pain Survey, the prevalence of neck pain and related disability in Saskatchewan adults. Spine 1998;23: 1689-98. - PubMed
    1. Hagberg M, Wegman DH. Prevalence rates and odds ratios of shoulder-neck diseases in different occupational groups. Br J Ind Med 1987;44: 602-10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borghouts JAJ, Koes BW, Vondeling H, Bouter LM. Cost-of-illness of neck pain in the Netherlands in 1996. Pain 1999;80: 629-636. - PubMed
    1. Gross AR, Aker PD, Goldsmith CH, Peloso P. Conservative management of mechanical neck disorders. A systematic overview and meta-analysis. In: Cochrane Library, Issue 4. Oxford: Update Software, 2000.

Publication types