The Australian registry of anti-epileptic drugs in pregnancy: experience after 30 months
- PMID: 12948456
- DOI: 10.1016/s0967-5868(03)00158-9
The Australian registry of anti-epileptic drugs in pregnancy: experience after 30 months
Abstract
Background: Most women with epilepsy need to take antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in pregnancy to prevent the potentially harmful effects of seizures. Retrospective studies have demonstrated an increased chance of having a child with a birth defect (BD) in women with epilepsy taking AEDs. It is uncertain how much of this risk is directly caused by the AEDs and whether certain drugs or combinations are associated with a greater risk.
Aims: To establish a register to evaluate prospectively the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to specific AEDs; to determine whether certain AEDs or combinations were associated with a greater risk; and to determine whether other factors influenced the risk.
Methods: An Australia-wide, prospective, voluntary, telephone-interview based, observational register. Three groups of pregnant women were enrolled: those with epilepsy taking AEDs, those with epilepsy not taking AEDs, and those taking AEDs for a non-epileptic indication. The pregnancy outcomes were evaluated by follow-up interviews and by reference to hospital and treating doctors' records.
Results: Over the first 30 months of the study (till December 2001) 334 eligible women were enrolled, with all states and territories being represented. Two hundred and ninety two pregnancies had been completed, of which 256 (88%) resulted in a healthy live birth, 19 (6.5%) a live birth with a birth defect, four an induced abortion because of a detected malformation on ultrasound, one premature labour with a stillbirth and 12 (4%) spontaneous abortions. Of the completed pregnancies, 269 were exposed to at least one AED during the first trimester. The incidence of birth defects in relation to specific AEDs was: valproate (16.7%), phenytoin (10.5%), lamotrigine (7.7%) and carbamazepine (3.3%), none of which was significantly different from that in women with epilepsy not taking an AED (4.3%, n.s.). The dose of valproate taken was higher in pregnancies with BD compared to those without (mean 2081 mg vs. 1149 mg, p<0.0001). The incidence of folate supplementation being taken prior to conception did not differ for pregnancy outcomes with or without BD (70% vs. 66%, n.s.).
Conclusions: The model for the Australian Pregnancy Register appears to be successful, with strong enrolment from all regions over the first 30 months. The study is prospective and includes reference to all new AEDs approved in Australia over the past decade. Analysis of the pregnancy outcomes to date may reveal early trends, but numbers are still to small for any definitive conclusions to be made regarding the relative risk in pregnancy of individual AEDs.
Similar articles
-
Critical relationship between sodium valproate dose and human teratogenicity: results of the Australian register of anti-epileptic drugs in pregnancy.J Clin Neurosci. 2004 Nov;11(8):854-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2004.05.003. J Clin Neurosci. 2004. PMID: 15519862
-
Navigating toward fetal and maternal health: the challenge of treating epilepsy in pregnancy.Epilepsia. 2004 Oct;45(10):1171-5. doi: 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.15104.x. Epilepsia. 2004. PMID: 15461670
-
Obstetric outcomes and effects on babies born to women treated for epilepsy during pregnancy in a resource limited setting: a comparative cohort study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jun 14;18(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1857-3. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018. PMID: 29898689 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy in Patients of Child-Bearing Potential.CNS Drugs. 2019 Mar;33(3):195-208. doi: 10.1007/s40263-018-00602-2. CNS Drugs. 2019. PMID: 30747367 Review.
-
Epileptic disorders in pregnancy: an overview.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec;20(6):557-62. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283184059. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008. PMID: 18989131 Review.
Cited by
-
Valproate poses risk to unborn child.Epilepsy Curr. 2005 May-Jun;5(3):116-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1535-7511.2005.05305.x. Epilepsy Curr. 2005. PMID: 16145620 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Advances in Epidemiological Methods and Utilisation of Large Databases: A Methodological Review of Observational Studies on Central Nervous System Drug Use in Pregnancy and Central Nervous System Outcomes in Children.Drug Saf. 2019 Apr;42(4):499-513. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0755-y. Drug Saf. 2019. PMID: 30421346 Review.
-
Should valproate be taken during pregnancy?Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2005 Mar;1(1):21-6. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.1.1.21.53605. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2005. PMID: 18360539 Free PMC article.
-
Pregnancy with epilepsy: obstetric and neonatal outcome of a controlled study.Seizure. 2010 Mar;19(2):112-9. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2009.11.008. Epub 2009 Dec 24. Seizure. 2010. PMID: 20036166 Free PMC article.
-
Monotherapy treatment of epilepsy in pregnancy: congenital malformation outcomes in the child.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 7;11(11):CD010224. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010224.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 29;8:CD010224. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010224.pub3. PMID: 27819746 Free PMC article. Updated.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous